ArticleTrends in hearing
Sweet-Spot Compression: An Amplification Strategy for Improving Listening Outcomes at Moderate to High Levels.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When speech increases in level from moderate to high, speech intelligibility (SI) can decrease. Termed rollover, this phenomenon is neglected during hearing aid (HA) fitting. A previous study introduced "sweet-spot compression" (SSC)-an amplification strategy for preventing rollover and improving listening outcomes at moderate to high levels. SSC aims to place speech in that area of an individual's performance-intensity function where both SI and listening comfort are high-the "sweet spot." To achieve this, it combines high compression ratios with long time constants to provide quasi-linear amplification in the sweet-spot area. Using a HA simulator, headphone presentation, and 16 participants with rollover, SSC previously outperformed a clinical reference condition in terms of listening outcome. Here, we extended this work by (a) mapping out individual differences in the most comfortable speech level (MCL) and SI in noise at moderate to high levels, and (b) evaluating the listening outcome with SSC further. Using a wearable research HA, we tested 18 randomly chosen participants with mild to moderate hearing loss. Our analyses showed clear individual differences in MCL and SI with linear amplification. SSC gave better SI and was clearly preferred in quiet and in noise relative to a clinical reference condition. At the group level, rollover did not occur for either SSC or the reference condition. At the individual level, we found fewer cases of rollover with SSC than with the reference condition. Overall, we conclude that SSC shows promise with respect to improving listening outcomes at moderate to high levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.