Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41841304›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2026

Restrictive vs Liberal Physical Restraint Strategies in Critically Ill Patients: The R2D2-ICU Randomized Clinical Trial.

Romain Sonneville, Camille Couffignal, Florian Sigaud, Michael Thy, Virginie Godard, Juliette Audibert, Damien Contou, Adam Celier, Michel Djibré, Thomas Rambaud and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04273360 (Restrictive Use of Restraints and Delirium Duration in ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04273360 nacompletednot on this map

Restrictive Use of Restraints and Delirium Duration in ICU: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2021 to 2025Enrolled423ConditionsRestraint, Physical, Mechanical VentilationArmsSystematic use group, Restrictive use group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Romain SonnevilleUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Camille CouffignalUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Florian SigaudMedical Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, La Tronche, France.
Michael ThyUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Virginie GodardAP-HP.Nord, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical Research, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, DMU PRISME, Paris, France.
Juliette AudibertDepartment of Intensive Care, Chartres Hospital, Chartres, France.
Damien ContouDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Victor Dupouy Hospital, Argenteuil, France.
Adam CelierAPHP-Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Department of Intensive Care Medicine R3S, Paris, France.
Michel DjibréMedical Intensive Care Unit, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France.
Thomas RambaudMedical Intensive Care Unit, Avicenne Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France.
Pierre JaquetMedical Intensive Care Unit, Delafontaine Hospital, Saint-Denis, France.
Armand Mekontso DessapMedical Intensive Care Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.
Claire BourelMedical Intensive Care Unit, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
Romane BelotAP-HP.Nord, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical Research, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, DMU PRISME, Paris, France.
Carine RoyAP-HP.Nord, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical Research, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, DMU PRISME, Paris, France.
Fariza Nait SidenasAP-HP.Nord, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, DMU INVICTUS, Paris, France.
Fatiha EssardyAP-HP.Nord, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, DMU INVICTUS, Paris, France.
Jean-François TimsitUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Renaud CornicAP-HP.Nord, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical Research, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, DMU PRISME, Paris, France.
Lila BouadmaUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM UMR 1137, Paris, France.
R2D2-ICU Investigator Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effect of wrist-strap physical restraints on outcomes in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains uncertain. Objective: To investigate the effect of a low-use wrist-strap physical restraint strategy in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label randomized clinical trial conducted across 10 ICUs in France. Between January 5, 2021, and January 2, 2024, 405 adult patients who had initiated invasive mechanical ventilation within the previous 6 hours and were expected to require ventilation for at least 48 hours were enrolled. Follow-up was completed on May 17, 2024. Statistical analysis was conducted from June 1, 2025, to December 15, 2025. Interventions: Patients were randomized to undergo either a restrictive, low-use physical restraint strategy (wrist straps avoided unless necessary because of severe agitation, defined as a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of ≥3 [on a scale from -5 (unresponsive) to 4 (combative)]; n = 201) or a liberal, high-use strategy (wrist straps applied systematically and reassessed daily; n = 204). Discontinuation of restraints was allowed in patients who were awake or extubated without delirium (measured via the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of days alive without coma or delirium during the first 14 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included incidence of self-extubation and day-90 mortality. Results: Among 396 patients with available primary outcome data, the median (IQR) age was 65 (56-73) years, 245 (62%) were male, and the median (IQR) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 7 (4-10). The mean days alive without coma or delirium were 6.67 days (95% CI, 5.69-7.65) in the low-use strategy group and 6.30 days (95% CI, 5.35-7.24) in the high-use strategy group (adjusted mean difference, 0.37 days [95% CI, -0.71 to 1.46]; P = .51). Self-extubation occurred in 18 patients (9.2%) in the low-use strategy group and 17 (8.5%) in the high-use strategy group, and day-90 mortality was 37.2% and 41.0%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, among adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU, a low-use wrist-strap physical restraint strategy compared with a high-use strategy did not reduce days free of delirium or coma at 14 days. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04273360.

Indexed as

ComaCritical IllnessDeliriumPsychomotor AgitationRespiration, ArtificialRestraint, PhysicalAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41841304
PMCPMC13080548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.