ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Ethical and clinical challenges in managing low-penetrance CNVs: insights from Portuguese clinical geneticists.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Low-Penetrance Copy Number Variants (LP-CNVs) are well-known to contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders and are also found in healthy individuals, presenting significant challenges to genetic counselling. However, data on the clinical management of LP-CNVs in Portugal is lacking. Methods: An online questionnaire was administered to Clinical Geneticists in Portugal regarding their management of LP-CNV and ethical issues were addressed. Results: The results showed a significant absence of agreement on LP-CNVs disclosure, particularly concerning whether decisions should be guided by expert panels or individualized for each case. Clinicians acknowledged the substantial challenges patients and families face in understanding genetic information, highlighting the need for a shared decision-making approach. Furthermore, there was considerable variability in ethical perspectives regarding prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic testing for LP-CNVs, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines. Our results strongly advocate for the development of national guidelines mirroring those established in other countries. Discussion: This work underscores several complex ethical issues requiring urgent exploration internationally. The observed postcode lottery highlights a failure of distributive justice, necessitating equitable access to standardized genomic knowledge across healthcare regions. Furthermore, the uncertainty challenge renders traditional non-directive counseling increasingly unsustainable, requiring a shift toward Shared Decision-Making (SDM) to balance child welfare against parental autonomy in navigating genomic ambiguity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.