ArticlePeerJ2026
Plant origin and irrigation influence floral resource value and pollinator attraction to ornamental plants.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GC-Ms, UHPLC-MS/MSChemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irrigation and plant origin are key factors influencing plant growth, development, and reproductive strategies. These same factors may also affect the floral resource value of plants to pollinators, influencing the efficacy of pollinator plantings for conservation or enhancement. While these factors have been studied separately, few studies have examined how plant origin influences plant responses to irrigation for floral traits such as nectar and pollen. In this study, we evaluated 10 native and 10 non-native plants to Florida under two different irrigation treatments and measured floral density, floral display, floral resources (nectar and pollen), and pollinator visitation rates and diversity in an open field study. There was strong to very strong evidence that native plants produced higher floral densities and displays, along with greater amounts of pollen per plot, and attracted a higher number and diversity of pollinators as compared to non-native plants. Additionally, there was weak to moderate evidence that fully irrigated plants produced higher nectar volumes and pollen quantities per plot as well as pollen with higher protein content as compared to partially irrigated plants. However, there was no evidence that native and non-native plants responded differently to irrigation treatment. Additionally, individual pollinator guilds responded differently to origin and irrigation, highlighting the complexity of plant-pollinator interactions. We conclude that native plants consistently produce more flowers and attract a greater number and diversity of pollinators while irrigation affects the production and resource value of pollen and nectar. These findings emphasize the importance of considering both plant origin and irrigation on resource availability of flowers when selecting pollinator-friendly plants under varying climates and management regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.