ArticleCureus2026
Intravascular Lithotripsy for Peripheral Arterial Disease: Outcomes From a Single-Center Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is increasingly used to treat heavily calcified lower-limb arterial disease. We audited outcomes from a UK vascular center to assess the safety and effectiveness of this modality. Methods This was a single-center prospective audit of consecutive patients undergoing IVL at a UK vascular center between March 2023 and September 2025. Demographic data, lesion characteristics (including peripheral artery calcification scoring system {PACSS} grade), procedural details, and outcomes were recorded. Primary outcomes assessed safety, measured by 30-day survival, 30-day amputation-free survival (AFS), and procedure-related complications (perforation, dissection, and distal embolization), and effectiveness, defined as target vessel recanalization. Secondary outcomes included 30-day hospital readmission and one-year AFS. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test and t-tests, as appropriate, with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Follow-up duration ranged from two to 24 months. Results Forty-five patients were included, of whom 37 (82.2%) were men, with a median age of 76.0 years. Twenty-four patients (53.3%) were elective admissions. Most procedures involved the superficial femoral artery (SFA), above-knee popliteal, and tibial segments, with Rutherford classes predominantly 4-5. Technical success was achieved in 91% (n = 41) of cases, and immediate procedural complications were infrequent. The 30-day readmission rate was 24.2% (n = 11). Severe calcification (PACSS grades 4-5) was not associated with major amputation (p = 0.67) or peri-procedural complications (p = 1.00). Thirty-day AFS was 75.6% (n = 37; 95% CI: 69.4%-91.7%), and 30-day overall survival was 88.9% (n = 40). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher following emergency admission compared to elective admission (p = 0.03). At one year, major amputation occurred in 21.4% (n = 9) and all-cause mortality in 9.5%. Thirty-day readmission strongly predicted subsequent major amputation (66.7% versus 15.6%; p = 0.006). Conclusions In a predominantly critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) cohort with heavy arterial calcification, adjunctive IVL achieved high technical success with low peri-procedural complication rates. Early limb and survival outcomes were largely driven by baseline disease severity and the urgency of presentation, with emergency admission and early readmission serving as adverse prognostic markers. IVL appears to be a safe and effective vessel preparation strategy in complex calcified disease, supporting the need for larger prospective studies to refine patient selection and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.