ArticleCureus2026
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Infection Prevention and Control Among Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Hospital in Mauritius.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Many hospitalized patients suffer from healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), particularly drug-resistant infections. Infection prevention and control (IPC) is one of the most cost-effective healthcare investments since most HAIs can be prevented by the implementation of effective IPC interventions. This study aims to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of healthcare workers (HCW) regarding IPC, given that these factors may shape their compliance with IPC guidelines. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr Bruno Cheong Hospital in Mauritius, from March 2024 to April 2024. Demographic information and KAP scores were collected through a self-administered questionnaire. Results A total of 58 responses were analyzed; 69% of participants scored more than 70% on the IPC knowledge questionnaire. The mean knowledge score was 12.5 with a total score of 17. The mean attitude score was 48.4 over a total score of 60. Mean knowledge was higher among nurses (p = 0.001) compared to other personnel, and HCWs with five to 10 years of experience (p = 0.05). A total of 86.2% of participants scored more than 70% on the attitude questionnaire. The mean attitude score was 48.4 out of 60. The highest attitude scores were observed again among those with five to 10 years of experience (p = 0.05);84.5% of participants scored more than 70% on the practice questionnaire. The mean practice score was 48.64 out of 60. There was no significant association between knowledge and attitude (p = 0.69). There was a strongly significant association between a positive attitude leading to better practice (χ² = 25.1, p = 0.001). Conclusion Healthcare professionals, especially nurses, showed adequate knowledge, but they could not predict their attitude toward IPC. However, an adequate attitude strongly predicted better practice. Thus, targeted interventions to improve attitude are necessary to promote better engagement. Pathways, such as fostering a positive IPC culture via leadership, managerial support, more focused training, and better staffing ratios, could be explored to improve the attitude of HCW toward IPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.