ArticleCureus2026
Association Between Coffee Consumption and Academic Performance Among Second-Year Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Caffeine is one of the most widely consumed psychoactive substances, with coffee serving as a primary source among university students globally. Many medical students use coffee to counter fatigue, stay alert, and maintain focus during extended study sessions and examinations. Caffeine works mainly by blocking adenosine receptors, which promotes wakefulness and temporarily improves attention and responsiveness. However, excessive consumption can lead to anxiety, disrupted sleep, and reduced cognitive function, potentially affecting academic performance. Despite the popularity of coffee, its overall impact on academic outcomes among medical students remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore the relationship between coffee consumption and academic performance among second-year medical students following their prelims examination. Methods This cross-sectional observational study was conducted among second-year medical students to assess the association between coffee consumption and academic performance. A structured, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on coffee intake patterns, demographic variables, lifestyle factors, and self-reported academic indicators. Academic performance data were obtained from institutional records of preliminary examinations. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate descriptive and inferential methods to evaluate associations between coffee consumption and academic outcomes. Results A total of 249 students were included in the analysis. Of these, 172 students (69.1%) reported regular coffee consumption, while 77 students (30.9%) were nonconsumers. The mean theory prelim examination score was higher among coffee consumers compared to nonconsumers. Students consuming one to two cups of coffee per day (96 students, 38.6%) demonstrated higher mean examination scores than both nonconsumers and those consuming three or more cups per day (76 students, 30.5%). Examination scores also differed significantly across categories of sleep duration and reported caffeine-related adverse effects. Conclusions Coffee consumption was associated with academic performance among second-year medical students. Moderate intake was linked to improved academic outcomes, while excessive consumption, particularly when accompanied by sleep disturbances, was associated with poorer performance. These findings highlight the importance of moderation, adequate sleep, and healthy study habits in optimizing academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.