ArticleCureus2026
Erdheim-Chester Disease: A Diagnostic Challenge.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Pediatric Erdheim-Chester disease with cerebral ventricular system infiltration and epiphyseal involvement.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterized by excessive production and accumulation of histiocytes within various tissues. The discovery of activating mutations within the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway has established its neoplastic nature and enabled the use of targeted therapeutic approaches. Despite these advances, ECD remains a diagnostic challenge, often due to its nonspecific symptoms, multisystemic involvement, and consequent delay in diagnosis. We report three cases of ECD illustrating its diverse clinical presentations and diagnostic complexity. The first case involved an elderly woman with retroperitoneal and pericardial involvement, who developed urinary sepsis and died shortly after diagnosis. The second case was a man in his seventies with cardiovascular and renal involvement who did not respond to corticosteroids or peginterferon alfa-2a and died within a year. The third case, also a man in his seventies, presented with similar multisystemic involvement but achieved clinical and radiological improvement following targeted v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) inhibition. These cases highlight the heterogeneous course of ECD and the critical importance of early recognition and tailored therapy. Reporting additional cases contributes to a deeper understanding of its variable features, diagnostic pitfalls, and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.