ReviewCureus2026
The Current Landscape of Ophthalmology Training in Europe.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ophthalmology training across Europe has undergone a significant transformation over the last two decades. Although individual countries retain distinct systems for resident recruitment, training structure, and surgical exposure, the overarching goal has been to converge toward competency-based education guided by the European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) and the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). This narrative review draws on official EBO and UEMS policy documents, recent peer-reviewed literature, national curricula, and surveys of residents and educators. It examines the structure and duration of training, curriculum reforms, surgical exposure, simulation, fellowship opportunities, and the influence of European legislation on professional mobility. Residency programs in Europe vary in length from four to six years, with considerable heterogeneity in surgical case volume, fellowship opportunities, and access to simulation. The 2024 European Training Requirements (ETR) introduced Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), programmatic assessment, and e-portfolios, providing a common reference for national curricula. The EBO Diploma (EBOD) serves as a recognized benchmark for harmonization. Simulation-based cataract training has moved from optional to integral, though adoption remains inconsistent. Pressures such as the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and the COVID-19 pandemic have altered clinical exposure, while digital education and mobility programs offer compensatory mechanisms. European ophthalmology training is moving toward harmonized outcomes but retains structural variation between countries. Achieving consistency will require aligning national curricula with the ETR, mandating simulation milestones, investing in faculty development, and formalizing fellowship standards to ensure equitable access and readiness for independent practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.