Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41841055›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

The Current Landscape of Ophthalmology Training in Europe.

Maria Sidiropoulou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria SidiropoulouOphthalmology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ophthalmology training across Europe has undergone a significant transformation over the last two decades. Although individual countries retain distinct systems for resident recruitment, training structure, and surgical exposure, the overarching goal has been to converge toward competency-based education guided by the European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) and the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). This narrative review draws on official EBO and UEMS policy documents, recent peer-reviewed literature, national curricula, and surveys of residents and educators. It examines the structure and duration of training, curriculum reforms, surgical exposure, simulation, fellowship opportunities, and the influence of European legislation on professional mobility. Residency programs in Europe vary in length from four to six years, with considerable heterogeneity in surgical case volume, fellowship opportunities, and access to simulation. The 2024 European Training Requirements (ETR) introduced Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), programmatic assessment, and e-portfolios, providing a common reference for national curricula. The EBO Diploma (EBOD) serves as a recognized benchmark for harmonization. Simulation-based cataract training has moved from optional to integral, though adoption remains inconsistent. Pressures such as the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and the COVID-19 pandemic have altered clinical exposure, while digital education and mobility programs offer compensatory mechanisms. European ophthalmology training is moving toward harmonized outcomes but retains structural variation between countries. Achieving consistency will require aligning national curricula with the ETR, mandating simulation milestones, investing in faculty development, and formalizing fellowship standards to ensure equitable access and readiness for independent practice.

Indexed as

entrustable professional activitieseuropean training requirementsophthalmology residencyophthalmology trainingsurgical skills-based training

Identifiers

PMID41841055
PMCPMC12989116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.