ArticleCureus2026
Aesthetic-Cosmetic Concern and Its Importance: A Questionnaire-Based Comparative Study of Posterior-Midline and Postero-Lateral Scars in Lower Back Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Literature concerning the aesthetic appeal of incisions following minimally invasive spine surgery is sparse. We aimed to address this gap in the literature and to understand the cosmetic preferences of patients with respect to the postoperative scars after spine surgery. Objectives This cross-sectional study aimed to identify patient preferences and aesthetic concerns related to surgical scars in MIST (minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)) and SOST (standard open surgical TLIF). Methodology A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among people visiting an outpatient spine clinic to compare the aesthetic preference of patients. The study included 399 participants, with an age of 33.58 (12.82) years, consisting of 229 females and 170 males. The responses to the questionnaire with illustrative scars were analyzed with descriptive statistics to arrive at a conclusion. Results Among the participants, 238 expressed aesthetic concerns about scar appearance. A total of 153 (38.3%) respondents were more concerned about a scar on the back when compared to scars elsewhere on the body. A total of 306 (76.69%) individuals preferred the scar of surgical midline posterior TLIF (SOST) while 93 selected the MIST scar (p < 0.001). Notably, 139 of these participants (45.42%) changed their preference to MIST scars (p < 0.001) upon learning about the advantages of the modern MIST technique. Conclusions Patient-oriented aesthetic outcomes in surgery are essential. However, a lumbar spine surgical scar is of less concern than scars elsewhere on the body. Midline scars were noted to be more aesthetically pleasing than paramedian scars. Counselling regarding the advantages of modern minimally invasive techniques, however, can improve patient acceptance of the procedure despite the scar. Addressing patient concerns about scar appearance, psychological impact, and social implications should be integral to surgical decision-making and postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.