ReviewCureus2026
Condylar Sag After Orthognathic Surgery: Biomechanical Mechanisms, Surgical Factors, and Clinical Prevention.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Condylar sag is a clinically important consideration following orthognathic surgery, with potential consequences for occlusal stability, skeletal relapse, and long-term temporomandibular joint (TMJ) health. Despite advances in digital surgical planning, fixation techniques, and imaging modalities, postoperative alterations in condylar position remain inconsistently defined, variably interpreted, and often managed without a unified conceptual framework. This narrative review synthesises contemporary literature (2000-2025) to address this gap by examining condylar sag from a biomechanical and functional perspective. The review focuses on the interaction between proximal segment biomechanics, neuromuscular adaptation, magnitude and direction of surgical movement, fixation strategy, and the adaptive capacity of the TMJ. The synthesised evidence indicates that condylar sag should not be viewed as a uniform technical complication but rather as a dynamic and frequently modifiable response influenced by perioperative decision-making and postoperative functional loading. Diagnostic challenges related to imaging modality and timing are highlighted, emphasising the importance of correlating radiographic findings with clinical symptoms and functional assessment to distinguish physiological adaptation from pathological instability. Preventive and management strategies are discussed across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases, underscoring the roles of accurate condylar seating, controlled biomechanics, and structured rehabilitation. By shifting emphasis from incidence-based descriptions toward a mechanism-oriented understanding, this review provides a clinically relevant framework to minimise significant condylar sag, preserve TMJ health, and optimise long-term stability following orthognathic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.