In one paragraphArticle in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
9 authors.
Zhixin LuoCurtin Centre for Advanced Energy Materials and Technologies (CAEMT), Western Australian School of Mines (WASM), Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Tianjiu ZhuCurtin Centre for Advanced Energy Materials and Technologies (CAEMT), Western Australian School of Mines (WASM), Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Zehua WangCurtin Centre for Advanced Energy Materials and Technologies (CAEMT), Western Australian School of Mines (WASM), Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Nai ShiCurtin Centre for Advanced Energy Materials and Technologies (CAEMT), Western Australian School of Mines (WASM), Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Gaopeng ZhouCurtin Centre for Advanced Energy Materials and Technologies (CAEMT), Western Australian School of Mines (WASM), Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Leqi ZhaoCurtin Centre for Advanced Energy Materials and Technologies (CAEMT), Western Australian School of Mines (WASM), Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2270-1257 Lichao JiaSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Lab of Material Processing and Die and Mould Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-1827 Zongping ShaoCurtin Centre for Advanced Energy Materials and Technologies (CAEMT), Western Australian School of Mines (WASM), Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-183X Funding
Australian Research Council DP200103315Australian Research Council DP200103332Australian Research Council DP230100685Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Research Hubs IH220100012National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFF0506300National Natural Science Foundation of China 52472202
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) are promising electrochemical power generation devices, yet the ion diffusion behavior within their electrolyte bulk under real operating conditions remains poorly understood, hindering further development from both materials design and operation parameters optimization. This study tackles this issue of the benchmark protonic BaZr
Indexed as
boundary hydrogenationelectrolyte hydration dynamicion conductions transitionmixed ionic conductorproton conductorprotonic ceramic cell
Identifiers
PMID41841004
PMCPMC13103625
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390