Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2026
Endoscopic-assisted nasal bone reduction for nasal bone fracture as a practical outpatient approach: A retrospective case series.
Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscope-assisted nasal bone reduction performed in the outpatient clinic and determine whether this technique offers advantages over conventional closed reduction methods.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 64 patients who underwent endoscope-assisted nasal bone reduction between May 2022 and December 2024 at a tertiary university hospital. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed via clinical examination, facial computed tomography, and patient-reported satisfaction scores at 3 months postoperatively.ResultsAll procedures were successfully performed under local anesthesia without the need for general anesthesia or conversion to open surgery. Direct endoscopic visualization allowed real-time confirmation of fracture reduction. At 3 months, 87.5% of the patients had achieved favorable nasal symmetry, and >80% reported "excellent" satisfaction. The revision rate was 14.1%, and the incidence of saddle nose deformity was 1.6%. No significant complications such as infection, persistent bleeding, or major deformities were observed.ConclusionsEndoscope-assisted nasal bone reduction provides advantages over traditional closed reduction in terms of enhanced accuracy, improved patient satisfaction, and feasibility of early intervention in the outpatient setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.