Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840732›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026

Simulosophists: evolving the professional identity of simulation practitioners.

Griselda Gonzalez-Caminal, Laura Castillejos-Gallego, Carmen Gomar-Sancho

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Griselda Gonzalez-CaminalGlobal Research on Wellbeing (GRoW) Research Group, Blanquerna School of Health Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain. griseldagc@blanquerna.url.edu.
Laura Castillejos-GallegoBSN and Simulation Practitioner, Dakar, Senegal.
Carmen Gomar-SanchoInstitut de Recerca i Innovació en Ciències de la Vida i de la Salut de la Catalunya Central. IRIS-CC. Vic, Barcelona , Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation educators frequently cultivate psychological safety and reflective practice within simulated environments, yet these same values often fail to translate into their broader professional contexts as members of teaching department or healthcare teams. This inconsistency-between what is modelled in simulation and what is lived in everyday work-reveals a deeper issue of professional dissonance that is not fully addressed by existing simulation standards and codes of ethics, which largely focus on conduct within educational activities rather than in wider workplace cultures. Moreover, many simulation practitioners "wear multiple hats," simultaneously inhabiting roles as clinicians, educators, and leaders, which can blur boundaries and expose tensions between espoused values and organizational hierarchies. This conceptual paper proposes the concept of the simulosophist-a simulation practitioner who not only teaches but lives on the foundational principles of simulation: ethical integrity, reflection, and psychological safety-across roles and contexts-and argues that the evolution toward this identity requires coordinated action at individual, institutional, and disciplinary level. The simulosophist bridges the gap between simulated and real-world practice, modeling coherence across roles and contexts. By embracing this multi-level perspective and this proposed professional identity, simulation practitioners can advance simulation not merely as a pedagogy, but as a culture of integrity and professional practice that is consistently enacted beyond the simulation room.

Indexed as

FacilitatorProfessional identityProfessionalismPsychological safetySimulation

Identifiers

PMID41840732
PMCPMC12990652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.