Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840706›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Helping with Outcomes for Low Desire (HOLD): Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial assessing a cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for sexual interest/arousal disorder.

Justin P K Shimizu, Katrina N Bouchard, Sophie Bergeron, Alice Girouard, Nevena Popova, Natalie O Rosen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06777277 (Cognitive-Behavioural Couple Therapy for Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06777277 narecruitingnot on this map

Cognitive-Behavioural Couple Therapy for Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorDalhousie UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled170ConditionsSexual Interest/Arousal DisorderArmsCognitive-behavioral therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justin P K ShimizuDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. jshimizu@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5903-4436
Katrina N BouchardUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Sophie BergeronUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Alice GirouardDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Nevena PopovaUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Natalie O RosenDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 02303PJT-496676-PB1-CHAA-183196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA strong, satisfying sexual relationship-for which sexual desire and arousal can be key components-is often important for maintaining well-being in long-term romantic relationships. However, sexual interest/arousal disorder, defined by persistently low and distressing levels of sexual desire and/or arousal, is the most common sexual problem among women and gender-diverse people and is associated with psychological (e.g., depressive symptoms) and relational (e.g., lower relationship satisfaction) consequences. Partners of individuals with sexual interest/arousal disorder have also reported lower sexual and relationship satisfaction, higher sexual distress, and poorer sexual function compared to partners of people without this disorder. Prominent clinical and theoretical models emphasize that sexual interest and arousal are strongly influenced by interpersonal factors, and emerging dyadic studies support these conceptualizations. Although couple-based sex therapy is recommended, no studies have examined the efficacy of an evidence-based couple therapy for sexual interest/arousal disorder, nor its mechanisms of change. The current randomized clinical trial (RCT) aims to address these gaps by evaluating the efficacy of a novel cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for sexual interest/arousal disorder.

methodsWe aim to recruit women and gender-diverse people with sexual interest/arousal disorder and their partners (N = 170 couples), who will be randomly assigned to either an intervention or waitlist control condition. The intervention is a cognitive-behavioral couple therapy consisting of 16, 60-min (first session 90 min) manualized therapy sessions delivered over 18 weeks by a supervised therapist trained in clinical psychology. Participants will complete validated measures at baseline, during the treatment period, post-treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. Conditions will be compared on primary outcomes of sexual desire and distress and secondary sexual and psychological outcomes using an intention-to-treat approach and multilevel modeling. Emotion regulation will be analyzed as a potential mediator of treatment benefits. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for sexual interest/arousal disorder, which has yet to be tested in a large RCT. Findings aim to provide clinicians with an evidence-based treatment to better support couples coping with sexual interest/arousal disorder and to identify a key mechanism for treatment benefits.

trial registrationThis study was registered 15 January, 2025 on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT06777277).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyCouples TherapyLibidoSexual ArousalSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSexual PartnersTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCognitive behavioral couple therapyCouplesRandomized clinical trialSexual desireSexual distressSexual dysfunctionSexual interest/arousal disorder

Identifiers

PMID41840706
PMCPMC13104267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.