ArticleBMC psychology2026
Exercise motivation patterns in emerging adults: dual roles of weight and shape concern in activation and inhibition pathways.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise motivation constitutes a key determinant of physical activity(PA). However, prior research has predominantly adopted a variable-centered approach, thereby overlooking the coexistence of multiple motivational goals within individuals. Moreover, in the context of increasing body image concerns, the relationship between body-related concerns and individuals’ patterns of exercise motivation warrants further investigation. The work aimed to assess latent profiles of exercise motivation among Chinese emerging adult males and females, the association of weight and shape concern (WSC) with motivation profiles, and differences in PA across these profiles.
methodsA total of 2,112 Chinese emerging adults were surveyed using validated instruments measuring exercise motivation, WSC, and PA. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to identify motivation profiles. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations of WSC with profile membership, with body mass index (BMI) included as a covariate. Differences in PA across profiles were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.
resultsLPA identified four profiles in the male sample: low-motivation profile, fitness-oriented profile, moderate low-motivation profile, and high-motivation profile. Five profiles were identified in the female samples: low-motivation profile, moderate low-motivation profile, low social-oriented profile, high-motivation profile, and enjoyment and social-oriented profile. WSC was significantly associated with motivation profile membership. For males, higher WSC was associated with a higher likelihood of classification into the high-motivation profile. For females, however, WSC showed a dual association, associated with a higher likelihood of both the high-motivation and low-motivation or low social-oriented profiles. PA varied significantly across profiles. For males, the high-motivation profile exhibited significantly greater PA than all other profiles. For females, the high-motivation profile demonstrated higher PA levels than the low-, moderate low-, and enjoyment and social-oriented profiles, but did not differ significantly from the low social-oriented profile.
conclusionsExercise motivation exhibited significant heterogeneity among emerging adults in China. WSC was significantly associated with profile membership in both males and females. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of considering diverse motivational configurations and body image concerns in efforts to promote physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.