Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840686›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Can gastropexy reduce the recurrence rate after paraesophageal hernia repair? A study protocol for a double blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial.

J Blixt Dackhammar, A Tsoposidis, V Wallenius, S Kostic, Y Cengiz, G Linder, M Jeremiasen, A Analatos, L Lundell, B Håkanson and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06107634 (Can Gastropexy Improve the Efficacy of the Crural Repair in Patients with Paraesophageal Hernias? a Double Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06107634 narecruitingnot on this map

Can Gastropexy Improve the Efficacy of the Crural Repair in Patients with Paraesophageal Hernias? a Double Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErsta DiakoniRan2023 to 2030Enrolled124ConditionsParaesophageal HerniaArmsGastropexy, Paraesophageal hernia repair
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J Blixt DackhammarDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. johan.blixt.dackhammar@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1195-6406
A TsoposidisDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
V WalleniusDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
S KosticDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Y CengizDepartment of Surgery, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden.
G LinderDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
M JeremiasenDepartment of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
A AnalatosDepartment of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
L LundellDivision of Surgery and Oncology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
B HåkansonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
A ThorellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
M Reuterwall HanssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4424-8847

Funding

Region Västernorrland LVNFOU993495Region Västernorrland LVNFOU993665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite several attempts to improve the durability of the reconstruction of paraesophageal hernias (PEH), recurrence rates remain high. Gastropexy has often been added to the reconstruction with the intention to reduce recurrence rates by anchoring the stomach in the abdominal cavity. The efficacy of adding gastropexy to standard PEH repair has, however, not yet been investigated in a randomized controlled trial setting.

methodsAll patients scheduled for PEH repair are assessed for eligibility for enrolment. Preoperative work-up includes upper GI endoscopy, computed tomography, and symptom assessments. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to either the control or intervention group. In the control group, patients will have a standardized repair, including posterior crural repair and a total fundoplication. In the intervention group, a three-point gastropexy using running non-absorbable sutures will be added to the same reconstruction as in the control group: a posterior fixation of the wrap to the diaphragm, a lateral fixation of the left wrap to the diaphragm, and an anterior fixation of the minor curvature to the inner surface of the anterior abdominal wall. The primary outcome is computed tomography-verified radiological recurrence at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include radiological recurrence at 3 years, patient-reported quality of life, and disease-specific symptoms at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years, as well as postoperative complications. The study design is double-blinded, with both participants and outcome assessors being blinded to the allocation of patients to treatment arms. DISCUSSION: Although gastropexy is frequently used in PEH repair with the intent to reduce recurrence rates, the scientific evidence behind its effects is limited. The present trial is the first RCT to evaluate the efficacy of gastropexy combined with a standardized PEH repair.

trial registrationThe trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06107634 . Registered 9 September 2023.

Indexed as

GastropexyHernia, HiatalHerniorrhaphyAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFundoplicationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCrural repairGastropexyGERDHiatal hernia recurrenceHiatal hernia repairNissen fundoplicationObstructive symptomsParaesophageal herniaPatient reported outcome measuresQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID41840686
PMCPMC13063770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.