Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840685›Full record

SynthesisChiropractic & manual therapies2026

Adverse events among older adults receiving chiropractic spinal manipulation and related treatments: an updated systematic review.

Clinton J Daniels, Ronald J Farabaugh, Stacie A Salsbury, Kristian R Anderson, Maranda J Kleppe, Wayne M Whalen, Sheryl A Walters, Lisa Z Killinger, Alec L Schielke

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clinton J DanielsVA Puget Sound Health Care System, 9600 Veterans Drive SW, Tacoma, WA, USA. Clinton.daniels@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-6184
Ronald J FarabaughAmerican Chiropractic Association, Highland Park, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4433-4251
Stacie A SalsburyPalmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9668-2426
Kristian R AndersonSpectra Health, Grand Forks, ND, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6452-3439
Maranda J KleppePalmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9554-6040
Wayne M WhalenPrivate Practice, Santee, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1992-9031
Sheryl A WaltersLogan University, Chesterfield, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2280-4280
Lisa Z KillingerPrivate Practice, Bettendorf, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5903-7439
Alec L SchielkeVA Palo Alto Health Care System, San Jose, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1257-6141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review updated adverse events (AEs) reporting in persons aged > 55 years who received chiropractic treatment, including spinal manipulation.

methodsProtocol was registered prospectively with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42024629286). Search strategy was audited with Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) methodology. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, AMED, and Index to Chiropractic Literature on December 12, 2025. We included AEs attributed to treatment provided by chiropractors reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case reports/series. We excluded non-clinical, pilot/feasibility studies, surveys, reviews, populations ≤ 55 years,and papers lacking chiropractic treatment or AE descriptions. Articles were screened and results synthesized by study design and AE characteristics. Study risk of bias (RoB) was assessed in duplicate using Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network checklists. Clinical Compass and NCMIC Foundation partially funded this study.

resultsWe screened 2295 titles/abstracts, reviewed 125 full-text, and included 25 articles from 6 RCTs, 4 observational studies, and 15 case reports/series. One RCT had low RoB and five acceptable. Three observational cohorts had low RoB and 1 had acceptable. There were 412 study-related adverse events affecting older adult patients, of which 9 were severe, and none were catastrophic. Most adverse events were rated as mild-to-moderate in severity. Reported adverse events consisted of changes in pain quality, muscle or joint soreness or stiffness, numbness, weakness, fatigue, headache, dizziness, or lightheadedness. Several studies lacked AE definitions and/or data collection processes. Case reports described 6 severe AEs; four were vascular in nature. Twenty case reports involved spinal manipulation, one followed TENS application, and one repetitive shoulder abduction, while no case reports described AEs following chiropractor treatment with soft tissue techniques, exercise, or other modalities.

conclusionNo catastrophic AEs were reported in older adults receiving chiropractic treatment services. Mild-to-moderate symptoms such as muscle soreness and stiffness were common. The lack of standardized AE definitions, severity classifications, and data collection processes across reports limits the certainty. Notable study limitations included a search strategy focused on spinal manipulation, exclusion of administrative database studies that may detect rare AEs, and numerical scoring of RoB checklists.

Indexed as

Manipulation, ChiropracticManipulation, SpinalAgedHumansMiddle AgedAdverse effectsAgedChiropracticGeriatricsPatient harmPatient safetySafetySpinal manipulation

Identifiers

PMID41840685
PMCPMC13104207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.