ArticleBMC health services research2026
Self-care strategies among Arabic-speaking refugees and the Australian Mental Health Stepped Care Model: a Delphi consensus study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArabic-speaking refugees and migrants experience elevated levels of anxiety, depression and posttraumatic stress disorder, compared to the host country general population. This study sought to establish consensus on the perceived relevance of different mental health self-care strategies for Arabic-speaking refugees across the four settings of the Australian Mental Health Stepped Care Model: informal community care, primary/generalist care, community-based mental health services, and hospital-based mental health services (formal services).
methodsThe three-round Delphi study engaged a mixed panel of Arabic-speaking community members recruited from South Western Sydney and health professionals (N = 42). Data were collected via an online questionnaire, which was administered to the community members in face-to-face groups. Participants were asked to consider 73 self-care activities across three rounds. Activities reaching ≥ 75% endorsement were considered to have achieved consensus, those with 65–74% agreement were re-rated in the next round, and those with < 65% agreement were excluded.
resultsThe community panellists were predominantly older women. Consensus was reached on 46 of the 73 activities considered. Forty-five were endorsed for informal community care, 28 for primary/generalist care, 18 for community-based mental health services, and 4 for hospital-based mental health services. Three lifestyle-related activities (eating a balanced and nutritious diet, attending to personal hygiene and connecting with nature) were endorsed across all four settings, indicating their perceived universal relevance. Overall, activities emphasising social engagement, religious and spiritual practices, and culturally familiar community and leisure activities, were strongly favoured in informal contexts. Psychological strategies, such as goal setting, mindfulness and cognitive reframing, were seen as relevant to both informal community care and formal services.
conclusionsMost culturally and community-grounded mental health self-care strategies for Arabic-speakers with a refugee-like background were found to align with the stepped care framework. These findings can be used as recommendations for practice and program development with focus on integrating these strategies across different settings in collaboration with community organisations and services, and health professionals. Further research is required to examine their relevance for different population subgroups, and their effectiveness and feasibility for integration into clinical care to help address persistent mental health inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.