Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840666›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2026

Coleaf, an image recognition-driven approach facilitates the genome-wide association study with tea leaf morphology.

Mengwei Jiang, Shuai Chen, Weilong Kong, Yibin Wang, Shenyang Qu, Zhenyang Liao, Pedro García, Noor-Ul-Áin, Qian Zhao, Haibao Tang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mengwei JiangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Shuai ChenState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Weilong KongState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yibin WangState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Shenyang QuState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Zhenyang LiaoState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Pedro GarcíaHigher Engineering School, University of Almeria, 04120, Almería, Spain.
Noor-Ul-ÁinState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Qian ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Haibao TangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology and College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. tanghaibao@gmail.com.
Xingtan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China. zhangxingtan@caas.cn.

Funding

Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation 2024J01372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf morphology in tea plants (Camellia sinensis L.) profoundly influences tea quality and agronomic value, yet its genetic basis remains elusive due to labor-intensive phenotyping, foliage architecture, and ecological sensitivity of traits. Moreover, traditional methods forfeit quantitative color gradients and population-level morphological complexity. To address this challenge, we developed coleaf, an open-source image recognition-based software that demonstrated 97.6% accuracy over conventional ImageJ measurements, while offering higher efficiency and color hues quantification. We then estimated 7 key morphological traits focusing on leaves from a collection of ~ 4,200 mature leaves and ~ 5,000 bud-leaf samples across 167 genetically diverse tea accessions by coleaf. While classical understanding suggests leaf shape differentiation between two varieties in genus sinensis assamica (CSA) and sinensis (CSS), our phenotypic clustering revealed incomplete congruence with phylogenetic relationships, suggesting the presence of additional genetic or environmental modulators beyond population divergence. Furthermore, we integrated phenotypic data with whole-genome resequencing for multi-model genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Candidate genes associated with leaf architecture were involved in plant development (e.g., CsFAS2), cell division and elongation (e.g., CsFIP1), and cellular morphogenesis (e.g., CsRLK), whereas those associated with leaf color, regulated pigment accumulation (e.g., ABC transporters, CsMYB113). In conclusion, this study establishes a standardized computational framework validating automated image recognition for plant leaf phenomics. The end-to-end framework from high-throughput phenotyping to gene discovery provides critical genetic targets for tea breeding, demonstrating transformative potential in accelerating the genetic improvement of tea plants.

Indexed as

GWASImage processingLeaf morphologyTea plant

Identifiers

PMID41840666
PMCPMC13107895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.