ArticleBMC medical education2026
Between loss and learning: a qualitative interview study of donor family voices and institutional practices in whole-body donation for medical education in Türkiye.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Türkiye, whole-body donation for medical education and research is legally permitted, yet family involvement is central to whether donation proceeds. Despite this, donor family experiences remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore how surviving family members experienced and interpreted whole-body donation within medical education.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 family members of 14 donors whose bodies were donated to the anatomy departments of Ege University and Koç University (2020–2023). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree interrelated themes were identified. First, institutional trust was constructed primarily through interpersonal encounters rather than formal procedures. Second, donation emerged as an ongoing family process involving interpretation of donor intent, moral meaning-making, and, in some cases, advocacy. Third, closure was experienced as a fluid and uneven process shaped by disrupted burial practices, commemoration, and continuing bonds with the donor. Clear communication, logistical support, and symbolic recognition were perceived as supportive, whereas uncertainty increased emotional strain. Religious considerations functioned mainly as contextual background rather than primary decision drivers.
conclusionsWhole-body donation was experienced by families as a relational and ethically mediated process extending beyond first-person consent. Although donor registration initiates donation, family authorization and interpretation of donor intent remain decisive in practice. Family-centered institutional practices may strengthen trust, support closure, and support ethically grounded anatomy education. By centering donor family perspectives within a family-mediated consent context, this study offers evidence to inform donor-centered policy, communication practices, and the sustainable development of body donation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.