ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
No evidence of zoonotic viruses in selected captive and wild-caught grasscutters (Thryonomys swinderianus) in the ashanti region of ghana: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases are a significant threat to public health globally. Thryonomys swinderianus (grasscutters) are widely hunted and farmed as a source of protein in Ghana, which introduces the possibility of zoonotic disease transmission between the animals and handlers. This study investigated the prevalence and zoonotic risks associated with handling grasscutters in the Ashanti Region of Ghana.
resultLaboratory analysis of 334 nasopharyngeal, oral, and rectal swabs from 117 grasscutters found no detectable cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, human rhinovirus, monkeypox virus, rotavirus, or enterovirus. Thirty handlers of captive and wild-caught grasscutters participated, comprising traders (57%), farmers (23%), and butchers (20%). Gender disparities were observed across occupations, with all butchers and farmers being male and all traders, female. While 87% of the handlers had formal education, only about 26% had knowledge of the zoonotic potential of grasscutters. Not all handlers regularly used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or practised hand hygiene, and neither was significantly associated with knowledge of zoonotic diseases (p = 0.7; p = 0.8). Fluid exposure occurred in 87% of handlers, mainly through splashes (70%), with PPE usage significantly reducing splash-related exposure (p < 0.001).
conclusionAlthough the findings from this study indicated no immediate viral zoonotic threat from grasscutters in the sampled locations, it suggests surveillance should be continuously carried out through a One Health approach, especially as wildlife-human interactions increase. Also, educational campaigns and training should be targeted and consider biosafety practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.