ArticleBMC public health2026
Unveiling the narrative: Italian media's role in shaping public health messaging during COVID-19 - A corpus-assisted discourse analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective public health communication during emergencies is critical for influencing behaviour and maintaining trust. Newspapers remain a key channel for disseminating institutional guidance, yet the extent to which their coverage aligns with international recommendations (e.g., World Health Organisation, WHO and Pan American Health Organisation, PAHO guidance) is not well established. Italy, the first European country to experience major COVID-19 outbreaks, provides a useful case for assessing the extent to which mainstream newspaper coverage aligned with WHO and PAHO recommendations for COVID-19 reporting.
methodsA quali-quantitative, corpus-assisted discourse analysis was conducted on 5,621 articles (over 2.7 million words) published in seven major Italian newspapers and included in the national press review of the Italian National Institute of Health. Lexical and discursive patterns were examined using SketchEngine, combining quantitative keyword, collocation, and concordance analyses with qualitative close reading. Findings were compared against reporting recommendations issued by the WHO and the PAHO.
resultsItalian newspapers largely reflected key elements of WHO/PAHO guidance, emphasizing preventive measures, vaccine-related content, and reliance on expert and institutional sources (e.g., scientists, researchers, and public health professionals). However, recurrent use of non-people-first labels for affected individuals and occasional instances of “false balance” in vaccine coverage were also identified.
conclusionsMixed corpus-based and qualitative approaches can support systematic assessment of newspaper reporting against WHO and PAHO recommendations for COVID-19 coverage. While many aspects of guideline-consistent reporting were observed, gaps remain in the use of non-stigmatising, people-first language and in evidence-weighted framing of scientific disagreement. Strengthening collaboration between journalists and public health institutions may support clear, ethical, and trustworthy communication in future emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.