Trial reportBMC palliative care2026
Feasibility and acceptability of "LiCPain" pilot randomised controlled trial of continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine or placebo for people with neuropathic cancer pain: a qualitative study of patient and carer perceptions and experiences.
Trial report in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimal intervention and clinical trial designs require consumer contributions. The experience of people with advanced cancer and palliative care needs in neuropathic pain trials is seldom reported.
methodsThis exploratory descriptive qualitative sub-study aimed to understand the experience of patients and carers participating in the Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain (LiCPain) study, a pilot randomised controlled trial of continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine hydrochloride or placebo over 72 h in people with unrelieved neuropathic cancer pain. All participants enrolled in the trial, conducted at five Australian palliative care inpatient sites, were intended to be invited to participate at the time of consenting to the main study. Reasons for not being invited, consenting to or completing the interview sub-study were not collected. A single face-to-face or telephone interview was audio recorded by the site study team nurses or doctors using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were analysed following Braun and Clarke thematic analysis approach.
resultsOut of 17 participants randomised to the LiCPain trial, seven participants and one carer consented to participate in the qualitative sub-study. Three major themes were identified: • Trial participation offered a sense of hope and purpose; • The impact of the intervention has multiple contributing factors; and • Pain impacts every aspect of life.
conclusionsParticipants found hope and purpose in the Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain trial. Contextual factors influenced perceived effectiveness. These findings will inform future intervention designs and clinical trials to improve outcomes for people experiencing unrelieved neuropathic cancer pain.
trial registrationThis trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000747325) on 22nd May 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.