Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840528›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Neighborhood context shapes physical activity intervention outcomes: a comparison of human vs. virtual advisors.

Astrid N Zamora, Maria I Campero, Dulce M Garcia, Timothy Bickmore, Abby C King

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02111213 (Virtual Advisors for Physical Activity Promotion in Underserved Communities), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02111213 nacompletednot on this map

Virtual Advisors for Physical Activity Promotion in Underserved Communities

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2014 to 2018Enrolled245ConditionsSedentary LifestyleArmsVirtual Advisor, Promotora for physical activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Astrid N ZamoraDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1701 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA. astridz@stanford.edu.
Maria I CamperoDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1701 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Dulce M GarciaDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1701 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Timothy BickmoreKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Abby C KingDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1701 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.

Funding

NIH HHS 5R01HL116448, 5R01CA211048 and P20CA217199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeighborhood conditions are key social determinants of health (SDOH) that play a critical role in healthy aging. Incorporating contextual measures into behavioral medicine interventions is essential for creating adaptable, equity-focused health solutions. Yet, few physical activity (PA) interventions explicitly evaluate how these factors influence effectiveness. We conducted a secondary analysis of the Computerized Physical Activity Support for Seniors (COMPASS) Trial to examine whether neighborhood context, measured by the California Healthy Places Index (HPI), moderated intervention effects on PA among Latino/a older adults.

methodsThe COMPASS trial was a single-blind, cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial comparing an interactive virtual advisor (reference arm) with a trained human peer advisor. PA outcomes, including weekly minutes of walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), were assessed with the CHAMPS questionnaire at baseline and 12 months. Neighborhood conditions were measured with the HPI, a composite index of 25 indicators across eight domains (e.g., housing, education, transportation) that reflect place-based SDOH. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more health-supportive environments. Mixed-effects ANCOVA models adjusted for baseline PA, age, and gender, with a random intercept for study site, and tested effect modification via interaction terms between intervention arm and HPI.

resultsAmong 245 Latino/a participants (mean age = 62.3 years; 78.8% female), HPI significantly moderated intervention effects. When modeled continuously, significant interactions were observed for 12-month changes in walking (β = − 2.93; P = .041) and MVPA (β = − 2.54 min/week per HPI point; P = .033). These findings indicated that the human advisor was comparatively more effective in lower-HPI neighborhoods, whereas the virtual advisor produced stronger improvements in higher-HPI neighborhoods. In sensitivity analyses using dichotomized HPI, the interaction was significant for MVPA (β = − 112.9; P = .026) and trended for walking (P = .077).

conclusionsNeighborhood context moderated the relative effectiveness of digital versus human-delivered PA interventions. These findings suggest that tailoring delivery strategies, leveraging digital tools in advantaged areas and peer support in under-resourced neighborhoods, may enhance equity in health promotion for older Latino/a adults by explicitly accounting for neighborhood-level social determinants of health.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02111213 Registered April 2, 2014 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02111213 .

Indexed as

AgingMVPANeighborhoodOlder adultsPhysical activityWalking

Identifiers

PMID41840528
PMCPMC13104325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.