ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Deep learning-based non-invasive prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: performance of the YOLO-v11 object detection algorithm.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Classification of BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 Microcalcifications in Mammography Combined with DCE-MRI for Malignant-Benign Discrimination.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study proposes a deep learning-based decision support system for the non-invasive prediction of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast cancer using ultrasound (USG). Both localisation and benign–malignant classification of ALNs were performed using YOLO-v11, a single-stage object detection approach. The dataset created from labelled USG images was split into training/validation/test sets at a ratio of 70%/20%/10%, and the model produced a class label and confidence score for each prediction. Performance was found to be high with amAP@0.5 = 0.904s (benign: 0.866, malignant: 0.942); F1-, precision-, and sensitivity-confidence curves showed that thresholds in the 0.52–0.60 range provided a balance between sensitivity and specificity. Confidence scores for the malignant class were observed to be concentrated in the 0.82–0.87 band. The confusion matrix includes an auxiliary ‘background’ row/column representing unmatched predictions (false positives) and missed ground-truth detections (false negatives); background was not modelled as a semantic class during training. The findings point to a rapid and reproducible artificial intelligence approach that could reduce operator dependency in USG. The proposed model has the potential to provide radiologists and clinicians with non-invasive, real-time decision support in ALN assessment.
objectiveAxillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis plays a decisive role in the clinical course and treatment planning of breast cancer following diagnosis. Therefore, the accurate and early detection of metastatic lymph nodes directly impacts treatment success. Ultrasonography (USG) stands out as the most common and effective imaging method for evaluating axillary lymph node metastasis. The main objective of this study is to develop an artificial intelligence-supported USG analysis system to provide a decision support system for radiologists and clinicians in the detection of ALN metastasis.
methodsThis study included a total of 471 patients: 248 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2024 and 2025 and reported as malignant based on axillary lymph node biopsy results, and 223 control cases with benign lymph nodes detected in breast ultrasound scans. Using a dataset created from the acquired ultrasound images, a single-stage object detection model (YOLO-v11) was employed to detect ALN metastasis. The data were split into a 70% training, 20% validation, and 10% testing ratio. The developed model produces a confidence score and class label for each detection.
resultsThe developed model has demonstrated high accuracy performance in benign and malignant lymph node samples. The mAP@0.5 value calculated under the Precision–Recall (PR) curve was obtained as 0.904 (benign: 0.866, malignant: 0.942). The precision and sensitivity values were found to be 0.866 in benign samples and 0.942 in malignant samples, respectively. Confidence score values for the malignant class were concentrated in the range of 0.82–0.87. When evaluated from a clinical application perspective, the threshold value in the range of 0.5–0.6 provides a balanced trade-off between sensitivity and specificity.
conclusionThe proposed artificial intelligence model can localise axillary lymph nodes with high accuracy on USG images and distinguish between benign and malignant conditions. In this respect, the model has the potential to guide radiologists and clinicians as a decision support tool in the diagnostic process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.