ArticleBMC genomics2026
Unraveling genotype-phenotype relationships in hereditary hemochromatosis through integrated biobank data analysis.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType I hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), caused by pathogenic HFE variants, is among the most common autosomal recessive disorders in Northern Europe. HH genotype–phenotype associations have been difficult to predict due to variable variant penetrance and expressivity. In this study, population-based biobank data were used to conduct a large-scale analysis of symptoms associated with different HH genotypes and their potential genetic modifiers.
methodsLinked genotypic and electronic health records from the Estonian Biobank (n = 211,994) and UK Biobank (n = 405,931) were used to investigate HH genotype–phenotype associations. Pathogenic variants of all HH types in the Estonian Biobank sample were identified. Clinical markers derived from laboratory measurements and diagnosis codes were compared between HFE pathogenic variant carriers and controls [chi-squared test, phenome-wide association study (PheWAS)]. Carrier subgroups were defined according to the presence of p.C282Y, p.H63D, p.S65C, and all pairwise combination genotypes. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to identify ICD-10 codes and genotype groups with significantly different mean ages at first diagnosis. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) based on ceruloplasmin and ferritin concentrations were conducted to identify potential genetic modifiers. Fine-mapping was used to identify putatively causal single nucleotide polymorphisms (credible sets) in the Estonian Biobank GWAS results. Fixed-effects meta-analyses of combined GWAS results from both biobanks were performed.
resultsWe conducted the largest PheWAS with data from HFE variant carriers to date and catalogued pathogenic HH variants in the Estonian population. p.S65C homozygotes and p.C282Y/p.S65C heterozygotes in the Estonian Biobank sample were diagnosed with urogenital conditions (ICD-10 codes N42 and N50.8) at significantly higher rates than were controls. On average, N42 was first diagnosed 11 years earlier in p.S65C compound heterozygotes and homozygotes than in controls. We also identified a novel GWAS hit, CP rs61733458, with a significant impact on the ceruloplasmin level and ties to iron metabolism–related diseases.
conclusionsOur results suggest that the p.S65C variant is more clinically relevant than previously thought and should be integrated more into HH testing guidelines. CP variant rs61733458 is a potential genetic modifier associated with iron metabolism–related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.