Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2026
Comparison of supine vs head-elevated position on sensory block height following combined spinal epidural anaesthesia in Class III obese parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery- a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06889337 (A Comparative Study of Supine Position and the Head Elevated Position on the Level of Sensory Block After Spinal Anesthesia in Morbidly Obese Parturient Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparative Study of Supine Position and the Head Elevated Position on the Level of Sensory Block After Spinal Anesthesia in Morbidly Obese Parturient Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeuraxial anaesthesia is the preferred technique for caesarean delivery due to its superior safety profile and maternal–foetal benefits. However, general anaesthesia may still be required in emergencies or failed neuraxial attempts, particularly in obese parturients. Optimal airway management in this group is critical and the ramped position has been shown to improve preoxygenation, airway patency, and intubation conditions. While the ramped position may reduce the cephalad spread of local anaesthetic in non-obese patients, its effect in class III obese parturients remains unclear.
methodsThis single-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 2023 and July 2024 at the Women’s Wellness and Research Centre, Doha, Qatar. Ninety class III obese parturients (Body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2) scheduled for elective caesarean delivery under neuraxial anaesthesia were randomized to either the Standard Pillow (SP) group or the Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position (HELP) group. All participants received combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. The primary outcome was sensory block level, assessed 15 min after intrathecal injection using cold and pinprick tests. Secondary outcomes included block adequacy, epidural supplementation, analgesic requirements, incidence of maternal hypotension, vasopressor requirements, maternal satisfaction and neonatal outcomes.
resultsOf 2,740 women screened for eligibility, 90 were randomized, with 82 included in the final analysis. HELP group: n = 39; SP group: n = 43. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. At 15 min post-intrathecal injection, the HELP group demonstrated a significantly lower median sensory block level (T4) compared to the SP group (T2) for both cold and pinprick sensation (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of block inadequacy, opioid or epidural supplementation or conversion to general anaesthesia.
conclusionRamped positioning resulted in a lower sensory block height following spinal anaesthesia in class III obese parturients compared to standard positioning. Despite the reduced cephalad spread, block adequacy and clinical outcomes remained comparable, supporting the use of the HELP position to optimize airway access without compromising anaesthetic efficacy.
trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT06889337 on 23rd; Feb, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.