ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Scabies among Dutch higher education students: do cases notify their contacts and do contacts take adequate measures?
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scabies Treatment Failure: Beyond Drug Resistance and Toward a Multidimensional Understanding.Journal of tropical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScabies incidence has rapidly increased in the Netherlands, particularly among higher education students. We hypothesized that effective control in this group is hindered by poor contact notification by indexes and limited treatment by contacts. We assessed this in a questionnaire study.
methodsAn online questionnaire was distributed to students, focusing on their adherence to notification (indexes), and treatment and hygiene recommendations (contacts), as well as their health seeking behaviour.
resultsOf the indexes (n = 308), 59% had experienced multiple scabies episodes and almost two-thirds had not been notified beforehand. Notably, 48% self-diagnosed their condition. Most indexes notified all regular (bed) partners and housemates, 53% also notified all casual bed partners. Contacts (n = 269) were usually notified by the index; in 57% of cases the notifier was a housemate. After notification, many contacts washed their bedding (85%), washed their clothes or put them in bags (81%); applied permethrin/benzoate cream (78%), avoided physical contact with others (74%); many also notified their own contacts (59%). The general practitioner was frequently contacted, especially by indexes, although experiences were often rated poorly owing to conflicting or incorrect information.
conclusionsThe high proportion of unnotified indexes suggests a notification gap. Especially casual bedpartners often remain unnotified, presenting a risk for onward transmission. Contacts generally took adequate measures, although premature notification of their contacts may lead to unnecessary treatment or 'notification fatigue.' Enhancing healthcare support and communication might help to improve notification and prophylactic treatment behaviours and may play a crucial role in breaking the chain of transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.