ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Validity of complete blood count in detecting influenza among clinically suspected children in Sri Lanka: a retrospective study from low resource setting country.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInfluenza in children ranges from subclinical to severe illness with complications. However, confirmation of its diagnosis based on a positive PCR test for nasopharyngeal swab has become a challenge due to its cost and the discomfort of the procedure. The study aimed to assess the validity of Complete Blood Count (CBC) parameters in detecting influenza among clinically suspected children.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted in a sample of children clinically suspected of influenza at three private hospitals in Galle. All children with clinical suspicion of influenza by a consultant pediatrician who had both CBC and PCR tests for nasopharyngeal swab, as laboratory investigations extracted from available databases at relevant laboratories. The PCR test for nasopharyngeal swab was considered the gold standard test. Known group comparison and criterion validity were used in the validation process at a 0.05 significance level.
resultsThe study included 166 children (50% males). Median (IQR) age of the sample was 4 (2 to 6) years. Fifty-nine children (35.5%) had positive PCR results for influenza. There was no statistically significant difference in CBC parameters according to gender or age group. The median (IQR) WBC(p < 0.001), neutrophil(p = 0.005), lymphocytes(p = 0.002), and platelet count(p < 0.001) were statistically significantly lower among children with Influenza, while for PCV(p = 0.021), vice versa. They all had statistically significant diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.05) based on ROC curve analysis. WBC count had the highest diagnostic validity (AUC = 0.71; 95% CI 0.63-0.79). The cut-off points in detecting influenza were in the normal range for all parameters. All the CBC parameters had satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in detecting influenza among clinically suspected children. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: There is a statistically significant difference in full blood count parameters between the influenza-positive and influenza-negative groups. The cut-off points in detecting influenza were in the normal range for all parameters. CBC shows some predictive value but cannot replace PCR due to modest diagnostic accuracy. CBC findings combined with clinical presentation can be recommended as a cost-effective method instead of PCR to use in clinical practice, especially in low-resource settings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.