ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Uncertainty-aware automated labeling of intracranial arteries using deep learning.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Estimation of Blood Velocity from TOF-MRA Arterial Centerlines: Theory, Simulation, and Inverse Solution.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate anatomical labeling of intracranial arteries is critical for cerebrovascular diagnosis and hemodynamic analysis, but remains time-consuming and prone to inter-operator variability. While deep learning provides an automated solution, its clinical adoption is limited by the lack of confidence measures. Incorporating uncertainty quantification into automated labeling could enhance interpretability by identifying ambiguous or abnormal regions and support clinical trust, yet this aspect remains underexplored.
methodsTo address this gap, we introduce an uncertainty-aware deep learning framework for automated artery labeling from 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography (3D ToF-MRA) segmentations (n = 35). Three convolutional neural network architectures were evaluated: (1) UNet with residual encoder blocks, (2) CS-Net, an attention-augmented UNet with spatial attention, and (3) nnUNet, a self-configuring framework that adapts architecture and training to dataset characteristics. Confidence was modeled via test-time augmentation (TTA) combined with a novel coordinate-guided strategy to reduce interpolation errors during inference. Generalizability was assessed by evaluating a subset of the public TubeTK ToF-MRA dataset (n = 20).
resultsVoxelwise uncertainty maps highlighted anatomical ambiguities, pathological variations, and inconsistencies in manual references, providing intuitive confidence indicators. nnUNet achieved the highest performance (average Dice score 0.93; clDice 0.94; average surface distance 0.35 mm; 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance 4.51 mm), demonstrating robustness in complex vascular regions. On the TubeTK dataset, nnUNet maintained robust generalization (average Dice score 0.87; clDice 0.87; average surface distance 0.42 mm; 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance 5.85 mm). Validation against co-registered 4D flow MRI showed close agreement between flow velocities derived from automated and manual labels, with no significant differences.
conclusionThe proposed framework delivers a scalable, accurate, and uncertainty-aware solution for intracranial artery labeling. By integrating uncertainty quantification, it offers a transparent and clinically trustworthy tool to facilitate cerebrovascular imaging workflows and support subsequent hemodynamic analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.