ArticleBMC public health2026
Screen exposure before age two and developmental outcomes in early childhood: a national cross-sectional study in China.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between screen exposure and early childhood development requires further investigation, especially regarding the age at screen onset, daily screen duration, and potential gender-specific vulnerabilities. This study explored the associations between screen exposure before the age of two and domain-specific developmental outcomes, with particular emphasis on to age of onset, daily exposure duration, and gender differences.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the China National Nutrition and Health Systematic Survey for Children Aged 0-17 Years (CNHSC, 2019-2021). A total of 4617 children under the age of two were included. Parents reported their children's screen exposure history, and developmental outcomes were assessed using the China Development Scale for Children (CDSC, WS/T580-2017). Propensity score matching was applied to minimize potential confounding and selection bias. Three-level linear mixed-effects models were used to assess associations with age at onset, daily screen time, and gender interactions.
resultsAmong participants (49.7% boys, 50.1% rural), 15.4% had screen exposure. Screen exposure was significantly associated with a lower overall developmental score (mean difference: -2.58; 95% CI, -4.27 to -0.90), with the most pronounced negative associations in language (β=-4.54, 95% CI: -6.86 to -2.23), fine motor (β=-2.81, 95% CI: -5.19 to -0.43), adaptability (β=-2.34, 95% CI: -4.64 to -0.03), and social behavior (β=-3.01, 95% CI: -5.45 to -0.57) domains. The age at screen onset was not significantly associated with DQ scores. However, longer daily screen time was consistently linked to lower DQ scores, with the strongest associations observed in language (β=-3.70, 95% CI: -5.55 to -1.86), fine motor (β=-3.03, 95% CI: -4.65 to -1.41), and overall development (β=-2.43, 95% CI: -3.52 to -1.33). A significant gender interaction indicated that the negative relationship between screen time and DQ scores was attenuated in girls, particularly for fine motor, social behavior, and overall development.
conclusionsScreen exposure before the age of two was associated with poorer developmental outcomes, particularly in the language, social behavior, and fine motor domains. Limiting daily screen time emerged as a crucial factor associated with better developmental scores. Additionally, girls exhibited a weaker association between screen time and lower scores compared to boys. These findings highlight the importance of public health recommendations focused on reducing daily screen use and addressing gender differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.