Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840308›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2026

CRISPR-Cas9: Genome Engineering and Future Vaccine Applications.

Masoumeh Madhi, Pourya Gholizadeh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masoumeh MadhiDepartment of Human Bacterial Vaccine, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Karaj, Iran.
Pourya GholizadehDigestive Disease Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran. poorya.gholizadeh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-3996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system, a transformative genome engineering tool derived from prokaryotic adaptive immunity, is reshaping the landscape of biological research and therapeutic development. This review provides a critical synthesis of its rapidly evolving, yet underexplored, application in rational vaccine design. We analyze how CRISPR-Cas9 and its derivative platforms (including base editing, prime editing, and CRISPRi/a) are being repurposed from therapeutic gene editing to become indispensable assets in vaccinology. This transition is powered by the convergence of CRISPR-mediated precision with synthetic biology, enabling the rapid engineering of novel vaccine vectors and attenuated strains, the precise optimization of antigen sequences for enhanced breadth and potency, and the direct modulation of host immune responses. Notwithstanding this potential, significant technical and translational hurdles persist, including off-target editing risks, delivery inefficiencies in vivo, and unresolved regulatory pathways for genetically modified vaccines. We detail these mechanisms and evaluate the current preclinical and clinical landscape, while addressing persistent challenges in safety, delivery, and scalability. By delineating these advances and obstacles, this review outlines a forward-looking framework for leveraging CRISPR technology to create programmable, precision vaccines against emerging and re-emerging pathogens, moving the field beyond empirical methods toward a new paradigm of rational immunization.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic EngineeringVaccinesAnimalsHumansVaccine DevelopmentVaccinologyVaccinesCRISPR-Cas9Gene therapyGenome editingPrecision medicineVaccine development

Identifiers

PMID41840308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.