Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840235›Full record

Trial reportOral and maxillofacial surgery2026

Reverse-engineered stock plates as a "makeshift" patient-specific alternative: expanding the role of conventional plates in mandibular free fibula reconstruction.

Mohamed O Ghorab, Mohamed A Ellabban, Mostafa I Shindy, Mohamed G Beheiri, Mohamed H Zedan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05672056 (Demonstrator in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05672056 naunknown statusnot on this map

Demonstrator in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled8ConditionsFibula / Surgery, Surgical Flaps, Computer-Aided Design, Mandibular Reconstruction* / MethodsArmsComputer guided placement of a stock plate pre-bent on a 3D printed model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed O GhorabDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. mohamed.osama@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-1537
Mohamed A EllabbanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3723-4604
Mostafa I ShindyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed G BeheiriDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed H ZedanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4919-2405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimStock reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction lack the ability to use pre-determined screw holes in the digital workflow, reducing their accuracy compared to patient-specific implants (PSIs). We aim, through reverse engineering and integration of predictive screw holes, to enhance virtual surgical planning (VSP) guided reconstruction, making it a useful option in resource-limited settings.

methodsTen patients underwent mandibular reconstruction using free fibula flaps. The stock plates were pre-bent on STL models, 3D scanned and through reverse engineering; the screw hole positions were transferred to mandibular and fibular guides. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing planned and actual mandibular positions across four anatomical landmarks, using both linear and angular deviation measurements. Further, demographics and clinical variables were tested to assess their impact on reconstruction accuracy.

resultsThe mean overall linear deviation was 1.92 mm, and RMSE was 2.11 mm, with no significant deviations. Compared to a clinical threshold of 2 mm, all deviations were within range, except the anteroposterior deviation, which was significantly lower (1.36 mm. The mean gonial angle deviation was 1.66°. No clinical or demographic variables significantly influenced accuracy, except for higher intergonial deviation in two-segment reconstructions, specifically in lateral defects.

conclusionThe reverse-engineered stock plates demonstrated accuracy comparable to the 2 mm clinical threshold. This method offers a promising, cost-effective alternative to PSI for mandibular reconstruction, especially in resource-limited settings, without compromising clinical outcomes. Further research is warranted to improve the workflow of the "makeshift" custom plates. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: NCT05672056, Registered 2023-01-03.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesFibulaFree Tissue FlapsMandibular ReconstructionSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedBone ScrewsFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedComputer guided surgeryFibula free flapMandibular reconstructionVirtual surgical planning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.