Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840207›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2026

Biomolecular Crystallisation Through Soft Templates and Seeding.

Jerry Heng, Vivek Verma, Hamish Mitchell, Daniele Pessina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jerry HengDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vivek VermaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. vverma@ucc.ie.
Hamish MitchellDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Daniele PessinaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The crystallisation of macromolecules is largely dependent on the generation of supersaturation while also maintaining conditions that minimally disrupt their natural molecular conformation in solution. While conventional methods of generating supersaturation typically involve either lowering the temperature of the crystallisation solution or allowing solution evaporation to increase concentration, this is often unsuccessful in obtaining macromolecular crystals. This is because their flexible nature necessitates relatively higher energy to overcome the thermodynamic barrier to nucleation. Seeding presents itself as an innovative approach to mitigate this energy barrier and generate high-quality macromolecular crystals. This method involves utilising either macromolecular crystalline seeds, dissolved additives (soft templates), or undissolved additives (hard templates). The underlying principles of these methods primarily rely on three fundamental mechanisms: functional group matching, epitaxy, and topographical effects, all of which are extensively discussed in this chapter. Over the past two decades, there has been a significant enhancement in the success of macromolecular crystallisation, largely attributed to advancements in seeding and templating strategies. This chapter provides a comprehensive summary of the research conducted on seeding and templating to enhance the crystallisation capabilities of macromolecules, as well as the development of purification protocols for these intricate systems.

Indexed as

Macromolecular SubstancesProteinsCrystallizationMacromolecular SubstancesProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.