ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Teaching multimodal LLMs to comprehend 12-lead electrocardiographic images.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Performance of Vision-Enabled Large Language Models in Image-Based Electrocardiogram Interpretation: Exploratory Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Clinical artificial intelligence applications of vision-language foundation models.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Benchmarking General Purpose Artificial Intelligence for Accessory Pathway Localisation on 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Diagnostics: Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Multimodal Large Language Models in Electrocardiogram Interpretation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- A Current Review of Generative AI in Medicine: Core Concepts, Applications, and Current Limitations.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- High-accuracy ECG image interpretation using parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning with multimodal LLaMA V.3.2.BMJ digital health & AI · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are essential, non-invasive diagnostic tools for assessing cardiac conditions. Existing methods often have limited generalizability, focus on narrow condition sets, and rely on raw physiological signals, which may be unavailable in resource-limited settings where only printed or digital ECG images are accessible. Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer new opportunities, yet ECG image interpretation remains challenging due to the lack of instruction-tuning data and standardized benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce ECGInstruct, the first large-scale ECG image instruction-tuning dataset with over one million samples, covering diverse tasks including feature recognition, rhythm analysis, morphology assessment, and clinical report generation. We develop PULSE, a fully open-source MLLM for ECG image interpretation trained on ECGInstruct. We further curate ECGBench, a human expert-developed benchmark spanning four core ECG interpretation tasks across nine datasets, incorporating both synthesized and real-world ECG images to enable clinically realistic evaluation. Our experiments demonstrate that PULSEestablishes a new state of the art, outperforming general-purpose MLLMs by 21% to 33% in average accuracy. These results highlight the potential of PULSEto improve ECG image interpretation in clinical practice. All code, data and models are available at https://aimedlab.github.io/PULSE/ .
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.