Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840182›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Teaching multimodal LLMs to comprehend 12-lead electrocardiographic images.

Ruoqi Liu, Yuelin Bai, Xiang Yue, Ping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruoqi Liu *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Yuelin Bai *Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (SIAT), CAS, Shenzhen, China.
Xiang YueLanguage Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ping ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. zhang.10631@osu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are essential, non-invasive diagnostic tools for assessing cardiac conditions. Existing methods often have limited generalizability, focus on narrow condition sets, and rely on raw physiological signals, which may be unavailable in resource-limited settings where only printed or digital ECG images are accessible. Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer new opportunities, yet ECG image interpretation remains challenging due to the lack of instruction-tuning data and standardized benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce ECGInstruct, the first large-scale ECG image instruction-tuning dataset with over one million samples, covering diverse tasks including feature recognition, rhythm analysis, morphology assessment, and clinical report generation. We develop PULSE, a fully open-source MLLM for ECG image interpretation trained on ECGInstruct. We further curate ECGBench, a human expert-developed benchmark spanning four core ECG interpretation tasks across nine datasets, incorporating both synthesized and real-world ECG images to enable clinically realistic evaluation. Our experiments demonstrate that PULSEestablishes a new state of the art, outperforming general-purpose MLLMs by 21% to 33% in average accuracy. These results highlight the potential of PULSEto improve ECG image interpretation in clinical practice. All code, data and models are available at https://aimedlab.github.io/PULSE/ .

Identifiers

PMID41840182
PMCPMC13136441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.