ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
How the brain segments experience: ERP evidence of event boundaries enhancing memory formation in narratives.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Event boundaries are known to have an impact on how discrete events are remembered; however, the neural mechanisms supporting memory for boundaries themselves remain poorly understood. This study investigated how both event boundaries and preceding information are processed and remembered while listening to naturalistically spoken narratives. We recorded participants' neural responses (event-related potentials) while they listened to stories where a critical word signaled either a predictable (no-event boundary) or an unpredictable (event boundary) action. Critical words in the boundary condition were better remembered than those in the no-event boundary condition and elicited a larger N400 amplitude. Crucially, a subsequent memory effect was observed only in the boundary condition, with remembered critical words eliciting more negative N400s than forgotten ones, highlighting the role of increased demands in conceptual semantic processing in episodic memory encoding. Furthermore, a retrograde subsequent memory effect emerged also exclusively in the boundary condition, with more negative amplitudes to critical words when preceding information was later remembered, consistent with the notion that boundaries trigger rapid reinstatement of a recently experienced event. These findings provide compelling evidence that event boundaries act as "cognitive anchor points" that enhance the encoding of new information and also contribute to the strengthening of recently encoded events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.