Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840178›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

How the brain segments experience: ERP evidence of event boundaries enhancing memory formation in narratives.

Doruntinë Zogaj, Regine Bader, Axel Mecklinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Doruntinë ZogajExperimental Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Campus A2.4, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany. doruntine.zogaj@uni-saarland.de.ORCID 0009-0008-9378-9798
Regine BaderExperimental Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Campus A2.4, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Axel MecklingerExperimental Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Campus A2.4, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Project A6Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Project-ID 232722074 - SFB 1102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event boundaries are known to have an impact on how discrete events are remembered; however, the neural mechanisms supporting memory for boundaries themselves remain poorly understood. This study investigated how both event boundaries and preceding information are processed and remembered while listening to naturalistically spoken narratives. We recorded participants' neural responses (event-related potentials) while they listened to stories where a critical word signaled either a predictable (no-event boundary) or an unpredictable (event boundary) action. Critical words in the boundary condition were better remembered than those in the no-event boundary condition and elicited a larger N400 amplitude. Crucially, a subsequent memory effect was observed only in the boundary condition, with remembered critical words eliciting more negative N400s than forgotten ones, highlighting the role of increased demands in conceptual semantic processing in episodic memory encoding. Furthermore, a retrograde subsequent memory effect emerged also exclusively in the boundary condition, with more negative amplitudes to critical words when preceding information was later remembered, consistent with the notion that boundaries trigger rapid reinstatement of a recently experienced event. These findings provide compelling evidence that event boundaries act as "cognitive anchor points" that enhance the encoding of new information and also contribute to the strengthening of recently encoded events.

Indexed as

BrainEvoked PotentialsMemoryMemory, EpisodicMental RecallSpeech PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleNarrationYoung AdultEEGEpisodic memoryEvent boundariesPrediction errorSubsequent memory effect

Identifiers

PMID41840178
PMCPMC13260117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.