ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Meaningless but memorable: Reward associations boost recognition of abstract visual stimuli.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual word processing engages perceptual and memory-related mechanisms that allow rapid identification of written stimuli. While most research relies on meaningful words, recent work suggests that sublexical visual features-such as character strings-can similarly engage neural processes related to attention and memory. The present study investigated how motivational relevance and the memory status of the stimulus interact to shape recognition memory, as reflected in P300/LPC amplitude modulations. Across two event-related brain potential experiments (N = 48), participants learned associations between meaningless consonant strings and monetary outcomes (gain, loss, or zero outcome) based on either the character combination (Experiment 1) or the font type (Experiment 2). In a subsequent old/new recognition task, we orthogonally manipulated memory status and relevance by presenting both previously learned and novel stimuli. Across both experiments, we observed robust old/new effects in the P300/LPC time window. Critically, gain-old stimuli elicited enhanced P300/LPC amplitudes and higher recognition accuracy-indicating that motivational relevance can strengthen recollection even in the absence of meaning. In Experiment 2, this neural enhancement diminished over time, suggesting a dynamic shift from relevance-driven to familiarity-based memory processes when reinforcement is no longer active. These findings suggest that motivational relevance alone is sufficient to enhance memory performance and neural processing for abstract, nonsemantic stimuli. They also underscore the importance of low-level visual features in sublexical stages of visual word recognition and highlight how the impact of motivational associations may change as recognition strategies adapt over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.