Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840122›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2026

Impact of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy and vitamin d supplementation on fracture morphology and treatment of pelvic fragility fractures: a retrospective cohort study of 1493 patients from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry.

Alexander Trulson, Stefan Huber, Eftychios Bolierakis, Till Berk, Fabian Stuby, Andreas Höch, Christian Kleber, Isabel Graul, Philipp Pieroh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander TrulsonDepartment for Traumatology and General Surgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Stefan HuberAUC-Academy for Trauma Surgery, Munich, Germany.
Eftychios BolierakisDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Till BerkDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Fabian StubyEberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas HöchDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian KleberDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Isabel Graul *Department of Trauma-, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Philipp Pieroh *Department of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. Philipp.Pieroh@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis causes bone fragility and fractures, yet most patients receive no treatment. This German registry study of nearly 1500 elderly pelvic fracture patients found that two-thirds were untreated before fracture. Paradoxically, treated patients sustained more severe, displaced fractures requiring surgery more often, possibly reflecting advanced disease severity or altered bone properties from medication.

backgroundFragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are related to low-energy trauma and osteoporosis. Currently, data on secondary pharmacological fracture prevention and their effect on fracture morphology is rare. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients receiving specific osteoporosis medication (SOM), vitamin D supplementation only (VitD), or no treatment (NOT) before and after a FFP. Secondarily, we evaluated possible differences in fracture morphology and treatment in the study population.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the German Pelvic Fracture Registry (2018-2024) of patients ≥ 60 years with an FFP. Patients were grouped hierarchically in the following groups: SOM, VitD, or NOT. Demographics, fracture morphology, treatment, and postfracture group changes regarding osteoporosis treatment were compared between groups.

resultsOf 1493 patients, mean age 82.34 ± 8.06 years, predominantly female (83.5%), 98 (6.6%) had a SOM, 386 (25.9%) VitD, and 1009 (67.6%) NOT before FFP. The SOM group was significantly older, predominantly female (p < 0.05), and demonstrated higher prefracture functional independence (71.4% SOM vs. 58.5% VitD vs. 66.4% NOT; p = 0.018). FFP Type IV fractures occurred more frequently in the SOM group (33.7% SOM vs. 23.3% VitD, 19.8% NOT; p = 0.006) and were more frequently operatively treated (45.9% SOM vs. 30.4% VitD, 29.2% NOT; p = 0.006). Following a FFP, in 527 patients (35.9%), the treatment regime was escalated; in 463 patients (31.0%), no change occurred.

conclusionsDespite established treatment guidelines, two-thirds of patients who sustained an FFP received neither SOM nor VitD in Germany. Patients with prefracture SOM treatment sustained more unstable fractures requiring surgical intervention, possibly reflecting advanced disease severity or altered bone biomechanics. Secondary fracture prevention remains suboptimal, with one-third of patients not receiving treatment postfracture.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDietary SupplementsOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesPelvic BonesVitamin DAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesBone Density Conservation AgentsVitamin DFragility fractures of the pelvisGeriatric traumaOsteoporosis managementPelvic ring injuriesSecondary fracture preventionTreatment gap analysis

Identifiers

PMID41840122
PMCPMC12992445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.