ArticleScientific reports2026
Dyad practice facilitates motor learning in music.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Practice conditions that replicate performance environments can enhance motor learning. Dyad practice, where learners alternate between physical practice and observing a partner, offers a promising approach to music training by combining motor learning principles with collaborative strategies. This study examined whether dyad practice enhanced motor learning in novice marimba players compared to individual practice. Seventy-three university-trained musicians, who were naïve to marimba playing, were assigned to one of three groups: individual practice, dyad-full (physical plus observation), or dyad-half (reduced physical plus observation). Participants completed acquisition, retention, and transfer tests using mallet endpoint error as the primary measure. Acquisition analysis revealed that only the dyad groups improved right-mallet accuracy, while the individual group showed no such gains. At retention, performance advantages were observed only in the dyad-full group, likely due to greater overall task exposure. Critically, both dyad groups outperformed the individual group on transfer, indicating superior generalization of motor skills. These findings extend dyad training principles to musical motor learning and highlight its potential to improve training efficiency and promote equity in music education by enabling shared resources and collaborative learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.