ArticleScientific reports2026
A dual-branch graph neural network architecture for drug-target binding affinity prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks have emerged as a powerful paradigm for artificial intelligence driven drug discovery, offering molecular representation learning that surpasses many conventional approaches. Traditional experimental pipelines are both time and resource-intensive, modern computational strategies-particularly those that integrate curated libraries of FDA-approved drugs-can accelerate target identification and candidate prioritization. In this work we introduce a dual-branch GNN architecture that synergistically combines Graph Convolutional Neural Networks, the GraphSage framework, and Jumping-Knowledge modules. This network jointly encodes structural topology and functional attributes, generating enriched embeddings for molecular graphs. We evaluated the proposed model against 45 state-of-the-art drug and target encoding baselines across well known Davis and KIBA datasets.The Proposed Model demonstrates a quantitative improvement over the GCN model, achieving a reduction in MSE (33.98 vs. 35.24), a slightly higher Pearson index (76.49 vs. 76.19), and a better Concordance index (85.41 vs. 84.41), indicating superior performance in terms of both prediction accuracy and ranking, demonstrating superior accuracy and robustness for candidate screening and establishing a new reference point for cheminformatics tasks. To illustrate practical impact, we performed a case study on COVID-19 drug repurposing: the top-ranked drugs have been also found potential drugs including Imunovir and Remdesivir from existing antiviral drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.