ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of hydrokinetic turbines on rainbow trout behaviour.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrokinetic turbines are an emerging technology to supply reliable and renewable energy by harnessing kinetic energy from river or tidal flows. They are a potential alternative to current hydropower schemes that impound rivers, cause habitat fragmentation and fish mortality. To-date there is limited knowledge available about fish behaviour in the vicinity of hydrokinetic turbines and their effects on shoaling. In this study, juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were allowed to swim either individually or as a shoal of three fish in a laboratory flume with five turbine configurations of single and paired turbines. Results show the turbines did not reduce fish passage when in operation, and blade strikes were rare, none causing significant harm. Fish were more likely to swim in the turbine's downstream wake and upstream of the turbine (known as bow wake) when two turbines were operating because of the generation of larger areas of low velocity. Fish approached the turbines more often in shoals than alone and were overall bolder in shoals. This study suggests that hydrokinetic turbines do not significantly affect fish movement, thus supporting their utilisation as a suitable technology to extract renewable energy from rivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.