Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840075›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2026

The effects of reward uncertainty and alcohol intoxication on human sign- and goal-tracking.

Michelle Heck, Damien Lesenfants, Vincent Didone, Patrick Anselme, Etienne Quertemont

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle HeckPsychology & Neuroscience of Cognition - PsyNCog, Université de Liège, Place des orateurs 2, 4000, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8382-1581
Damien LesenfantsPsychology & Neuroscience of Cognition - PsyNCog, Université de Liège, Place des orateurs 2, 4000, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-2403
Vincent DidonePsychology & Neuroscience of Cognition - PsyNCog, Université de Liège, Place des orateurs 2, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Patrick Anselme *Department of Biopsychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, D- 44780, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-0962
Etienne Quertemont *Psychology & Neuroscience of Cognition - PsyNCog, Université de Liège, Place des orateurs 2, 4000, Liège, Belgium. equertemont@uliege.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-0779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalSign- and goal-tracking (ST/GT) behaviors capture individual differences in reactivity to reward-predictive cues and are increasingly recognized as translational markers of addiction vulnerability. While animal research shows that cue-reward uncertainty (i.e. the inability to predict whether a reward will follow its predictive cue) and alcohol modulate sign-tracking, empirical evidence in humans remains scarce. This experimental study investigated how acute alcohol intoxication and cue-reward uncertainty shape attentional responses to reward cues in humans.

methodsOne hundred eighteen young adult participants were assigned to one of four groups in a 2 × 2 design: Alcohol (0.5 g/kg) vs. Placebo and Uncertain (50% reinforcement) vs. Certain (100% reinforcement) reward conditions. Eye-tracking during a Pavlovian conditioned approach (PCA) task quantified ST/GT tendency, followed by a non-rewarded “omission” phase.

resultsReward uncertainty significantly increased attentional allocation to the reward-predictive cue (η²p = 0.04), consistent with animal evidence that uncertain outcomes amplify responses to conditioned cues. Contrary to predictions, alcohol did not produce reliable enhancements of sign-tracking (η²p = 0.01). Effects during reward omission were mixed: the groups that previously experienced reward certainty increased their attention towards the sign while decreasing their attention towards the goal. Exploratory analyses incorporating initial ST/GT tendencies as covariates further indicated that cue-attention during omission aligned with participants’ initial ST/GT behavior.

conclusionsReward uncertainty, but not alcohol intoxication, affected sign-tracking tendencies. By directly translating animal findings to a human paradigm with eye-tracking, these results support the idea that uncertainty affects how individuals orient toward reward-predictive stimuli, a process relevant to theories of addictive behavior.

Indexed as

AlcoholPavlovian Conditioned ApproachReward uncertaintySign-tracking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.