ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
The effects of reward uncertainty and alcohol intoxication on human sign- and goal-tracking.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationalSign- and goal-tracking (ST/GT) behaviors capture individual differences in reactivity to reward-predictive cues and are increasingly recognized as translational markers of addiction vulnerability. While animal research shows that cue-reward uncertainty (i.e. the inability to predict whether a reward will follow its predictive cue) and alcohol modulate sign-tracking, empirical evidence in humans remains scarce. This experimental study investigated how acute alcohol intoxication and cue-reward uncertainty shape attentional responses to reward cues in humans.
methodsOne hundred eighteen young adult participants were assigned to one of four groups in a 2 × 2 design: Alcohol (0.5 g/kg) vs. Placebo and Uncertain (50% reinforcement) vs. Certain (100% reinforcement) reward conditions. Eye-tracking during a Pavlovian conditioned approach (PCA) task quantified ST/GT tendency, followed by a non-rewarded “omission” phase.
resultsReward uncertainty significantly increased attentional allocation to the reward-predictive cue (η²p = 0.04), consistent with animal evidence that uncertain outcomes amplify responses to conditioned cues. Contrary to predictions, alcohol did not produce reliable enhancements of sign-tracking (η²p = 0.01). Effects during reward omission were mixed: the groups that previously experienced reward certainty increased their attention towards the sign while decreasing their attention towards the goal. Exploratory analyses incorporating initial ST/GT tendencies as covariates further indicated that cue-attention during omission aligned with participants’ initial ST/GT behavior.
conclusionsReward uncertainty, but not alcohol intoxication, affected sign-tracking tendencies. By directly translating animal findings to a human paradigm with eye-tracking, these results support the idea that uncertainty affects how individuals orient toward reward-predictive stimuli, a process relevant to theories of addictive behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41840075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.