Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840058›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2026

When RNA goes off script: ensuring transcript fidelity in transgene expression.

Rachel Anderson, Christalyn Ausler, Ankur Jain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel AndersonWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 455 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-3151
Christalyn AuslerWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 455 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9044-4380
Ankur JainWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 455 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA. ajain@wi.mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-1602

Funding

Elucidating the molecular and cellular functions of polyaminesR35GM151111 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI Ankur Jain · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) DAF2022-250422HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35GM151111NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasmids are the workhorses of molecular biology: fast, flexible, and often taken for granted. We clone, overexpress, tag, and mutate freely, assuming they will faithfully produce RNA transcripts that match the intended DNA sequence. This assumption is rarely tested and often invalidated. Sequences in plasmid backbones, epitope tags, and codon-optimized regions may inadvertently harbor cryptic promoters or splice sites. The resulting unexpected transcripts and proteins, while often undetected, can distort results and propagate false conclusions through papers, grants, and even clinical trials. In this perspective, we highlight published cases where plasmids have distorted results and misled interpretation. We examine the mechanisms and consequences of plasmid-associated expression artifacts and offer practical strategies to minimize them. Finally, we call for a revision of community standards for experiments using transgenes: deposit complete plasmid sequences and verify the resulting transcripts using RNA-seq.

Indexed as

PlasmidsRNATransgenesAnimalsHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticRNAAberrant SplicingCodon OptimizationCryptic PromotersPlasmidsRNA Processing

Identifiers

PMID41840058
PMCPMC13083845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.