ArticlePlant cell reports2026
Decoding core molecular mechanisms of heat-stress tolerance in Brassica napus using transcriptomics and machine learning.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageIntegration of conventional bioinformatics approaches with advanced machine learning and explainable AI identified 45 candidate genes and 21 top features (10 positive and 11 negative regulations) influencing heat stress tolerance. Heat stress is a significant threat to Brassica napus cultivation, a globally important oilseed crop for vegetable oil production. However, identifying the genes associated with heat stress tolerance is challenging using large-scale transcriptomic datasets with traditional approaches. This study combined conventional bioinformatics approaches with advanced machine learning (ML) models to elucidate the heat tolerance mechanism in the seed, flower, leaf, and silique. A total of 1,179 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, primarily related to detoxification, protein folding, response to heat, and heat shock protein binding, as well as pathways such as alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, glutathione metabolism, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. In addition, WGCNA identified 45 candidate hub genes across three modules, associated with four tissues. Interestingly, we trained three ML models, of which the random forest (RF) showed higher performance in terms of ROC (0.98) and accuracy (0.89) than the other two models. Further, we utilized explainable ML, applying SHAP analysis of RF model, and ranked 21 top features (genes) influencing heat stress tolerance, including 10 positive and 11 negative regulators. Among 21 top features, 13 overlapped with traditional bioinformatics approaches (DEGs and WGCNA), whereas eight (38.09%) were uniquely detected via ML models. Finally, expression of seven positive and one negative regulator were validated through RT-qPCR, supporting the findings of integrative meta-transcriptomic and ML results. Our findings provide the valuable resource and highlight the power of ML in genomics to predict the key regulators involved in heat resilience, providing valuable insights into the underlying mechanism of heat stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41840027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.