ArticleScientific reports2026
BrCaM an artificial intelligence model for surgical decision making in breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizing surgical decisions in breast cancer is critical. Choosing between mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is complex due to heterogeneous pre-operative clinical factors. We developed BrCaM (Breast Cancer Model), a machine learning–based Clinical Prediction Model designed to analyze pre-operative surgical decision patterns. A dataset of 5100 patients (age range: 18–96 years) treated at a Breast Unit with standardized protocols was used. Surgeon-guided feature selection and an end-to-end machine learning pipeline were implemented. Multiple algorithms were evaluated; AdaBoost performed best using 10-fold cross-validation. BrCaM achieved an overall accuracy of 95% in distinguishing BCS from mastectomy. Feature selection identified clinically meaningful predictors that reflect established criteria influencing surgical decisions. In this retrospective setting, BrCaM captures real-world surgical decision patterns based on clinical factors. These findings support the consistency of current clinical practice and provide a foundation for future prospective validation as a clinical decision-support adjunct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.