Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

BrCaM an artificial intelligence model for surgical decision making in breast cancer.

Daniela Evangelista, Vasuk Gautam, Luca Silvestri, Mario Zanfardino, Monica Franzese, Massimiliano D'Aiuto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela Evangelista *Institute of Food Science, Italian National Research Council, via Roma 64, Avellino, 83100, Italy. daniela.evangelista@cnr.it.
Vasuk Gautam *Norton Neuroscience Research Institute, 3991 Dutchmans Ln Suite 302, Louisville, KY, 40207, USA.
Luca SilvestriUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Mario ZanfardinoIRCCS SYNLAB SDN, Via G. Ferraris 144, Naples, 80143, Italy.
Monica FranzeseIRCCS SYNLAB SDN, Via G. Ferraris 144, Naples, 80143, Italy.
Massimiliano D'AiutoBreast Unit Aziendale, Presidio Ospedaliero di Boscotrecase, ASL Napoli 3 Sud, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing surgical decisions in breast cancer is critical. Choosing between mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is complex due to heterogeneous pre-operative clinical factors. We developed BrCaM (Breast Cancer Model), a machine learning–based Clinical Prediction Model designed to analyze pre-operative surgical decision patterns. A dataset of 5100 patients (age range: 18–96 years) treated at a Breast Unit with standardized protocols was used. Surgeon-guided feature selection and an end-to-end machine learning pipeline were implemented. Multiple algorithms were evaluated; AdaBoost performed best using 10-fold cross-validation. BrCaM achieved an overall accuracy of 95% in distinguishing BCS from mastectomy. Feature selection identified clinically meaningful predictors that reflect established criteria influencing surgical decisions. In this retrospective setting, BrCaM captures real-world surgical decision patterns based on clinical factors. These findings support the consistency of current clinical practice and provide a foundation for future prospective validation as a clinical decision-support adjunct.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingAdolescentAdultAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMachine LearningMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBreast cancerBreast conserving surgery (BCS)Clinical prediction models (CPM)Machine learningMastectomy

Identifiers

PMID41840022
PMCPMC13121618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.