ArticleScientific reports2026
Distance-based temporal similarity metrics for adaptive channel selection in multi-modal EEG-fNIRS BCI frameworks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurophysiological Characterization of ADHD in Children Using EEG Signals: A Machine Learning Approach to Executive Function Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Hybrid Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) systems that combine electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) achieve higher classification accuracy but face computational bottlenecks due to the high dimensionality of the data. This study proposes a computationally efficient channel selection framework based on time-series distance metrics—specifically Euclidean and Manhattan distances—to address the “curse of dimensionality” while preserving signal integrity. The proposed method uses a systematic electrode-pairing strategy and compares two thresholding criteria: Mean and Median. The framework was evaluated on two public datasets covering Motor Imagery (MI), Mental Arithmetic (MA), and P300 Speller paradigms. Classification performance was assessed using Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forests (RFs), validated using 10-fold cross-validation and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests. The results demonstrated that the proposed method reduced the channel count by over 50% across all tasks. Notably, the Median-based thresholding proved statistically superior (p < 0.05) on noise-sensitive tasks, achieving peak accuracies of 94.36% for the P300 Speller with the LDA classifier and 72.93% for hybrid MA tasks with the SVM classifier. Furthermore, topographic heatmap analysis confirmed that the selected channels aligned with task-relevant brain regions, such as the sensorimotor and prefrontal cortices. Crucially, the channel reduction reduced decision latency to 0.11–0.20 s, validating the system’s feasibility for real-time implementation. These findings suggest that the distance-based channel selection method, particularly with Median thresholding, offers a robust and high-speed alternative to complex heuristic algorithms for multimodal BCI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.