Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41839980›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A do-it-yourself water quality sensor network to elucidate contaminant signatures and improve land management advice.

James E Dare, Deniz Özkundakci, Richard W McDowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James E DareSchool of Science, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. jd227@students.waikato.ac.nz.
Deniz ÖzkundakciSchool of Science, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Richard W McDowellFaculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying contaminant loads to estuaries is essential for setting effective limits on resource use and safeguarding ecological values. Traditional monitoring programmes often rely on infrequent sampling, which can substantially underestimate loads and obscure key transport processes. While commercial high-frequency sampling stations are prohibitively expensive, open-source, do-it-yourself technologies now offer affordable alternatives for continuous monitoring. Here, we deployed ten low-cost, in situ monitoring stations equipped with research-grade sensors across an intensively farmed catchment draining to a sensitive estuarine environment in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. Using artificial neural network models trained on concurrent grab samples, we converted sensor measurements into reliable 15-min estimates of contaminant concentrations. High-frequency load calculations revealed nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment exports to be 6–87% greater than estimates derived from traditional monthly sampling. Moreover, time-series outputs uncovered distinct sub-catchment contaminant mobilisation and transport dynamics that would otherwise remain undetected. These findings demonstrate that open-source, high-frequency monitoring can substantially improve contaminant load quantification, provide new insights into catchment processes, and inform the development of land management and policy strategies that reflect the unique spatio-temporal patterns of contaminant export.

Identifiers

PMID41839980
PMCPMC13062004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.