ArticleScientific reports2026
UltraReporter for transforming spoken diagnostic cues into structured ultrasound reports with large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound reporting remains a manual, time-consuming process prone to errors and variability. We present UltraReporter, a compact 8B-parameter LLM pipeline that converts real-time spoken cues into structured ultrasound reports. To overcome data scarcity, we developed a multi-agent framework for synthesizing high-quality Chinese cue-report pairs from unpaired narratives. The model was further refined through template-augmented fine-tuning and defect-oriented preference optimization to ensure institutional consistency and minimize hallucinations. Evaluated on 1,311 gold-standard cases, UltraReporter outperformed nine state-of-the-art LLMs, achieving superior clinical scores (e.g. accuracy: 4.82) and NLG metrics (BLEU-4: 89.42). In a blinded reader study, its reports surpassed chief physicians in quality across normal, common, and rare cases, and 72% of prospective reports were deemed equivalent to original ones. UltraReporter integrates seamlessly into clinical workflows, generating ready-to-use reports in 1 second, significantly reducing documentation burden and demonstrating strong potential for clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.