Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41839955›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Land-use controls on soil organic carbon dynamics across Amazonian ecosystems, Brazil.

Gizachew Ayalew Tiruneh, Ciro Abbud Righi, Jefferson Lordello Polizel, Vinicius Gonçalves, Carlos Rodrigues Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gizachew Ayalew TirunehDepartment of Natural Resource Management, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia. tiruneh1972@gmail.com.
Ciro Abbud RighiDepartment of Forest Science, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", University of São Paulo - ESALQ/USP, Av. Pádua Dias, 11, P.O. Box 09, Piracicaba, 13418-900, Brazil.
Jefferson Lordello PolizelDepartment of Forest Science, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", University of São Paulo - ESALQ/USP, Av. Pádua Dias, 11, P.O. Box 09, Piracicaba, 13418-900, Brazil.
Vinicius GonçalvesDepartment of Forest Science, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", University of São Paulo - ESALQ/USP, Av. Pádua Dias, 11, P.O. Box 09, Piracicaba, 13418-900, Brazil.
Carlos Rodrigues PereiraEscola de Engenharia. Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola e do Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Passo da Pátria, 156. Bloco D. Sala 236,, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, 24210240, Brazil.

Funding

UNESCO-TWAS and FAPESP 2024/07604-3 and 2022/10456-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land-use change strongly regulates soil physical, chemical, and biogeochemical properties, with major implications for soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in the Brazilian Amazon to a depth of 30 cm. This study aimed to model and map the spatial variability of SOC stocks across the Brazilian Amazon, Brazil. A total of 649 georeferenced surface soil samples were analysed for soil texture, pH, total nitrogen, SOC, cation exchange capacity (CEC), base saturation (BS), and bulk density. To enhance predictive accuracy, machine learning (ML) algorithms—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—were applied. In parallel, structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed as a complementary analytical method to quantify both direct and indirect effects among predictors and SOC, thereby enabling causal interpretation beyond predictive performance. Model performance was validated through repeated 10-fold cross-validation using the coefficient of determination (R²) and root mean square error (RMSE). Among predictive models, RF achieved the highest accuracy (R² = 0.998; RMSE = 0.068), followed by SVM (R² = 0.992) and ANN (R² = 0.987). Variable importance analysis consistently identified CEC and BS as the dominant SOC predictors, while temperature contributed minimally. SEM explained 92% of SOC variability, with positive effects of CEC (β = 0.42) and negative effects of BS (β = −0.48). These findings highlight the reliability of ML for SOC prediction in developing climate-resilient land management strategies and targeted conservation planning across the Amazon basin. Future research should integrate high-resolution spatial data, deeper soil profiles, and time-series observations to improve SOC stock estimation under changing land use.

Indexed as

CarbonEcosystemSoilBrazilNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSupport Vector MachineCarbonSoilLand-use changemachine learningSoil organic carbonStructural equation modelingtropical soils

Identifiers

PMID41839955
PMCPMC13125334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.