ArticleScientific reports2026
Land-use controls on soil organic carbon dynamics across Amazonian ecosystems, Brazil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Land-use change strongly regulates soil physical, chemical, and biogeochemical properties, with major implications for soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in the Brazilian Amazon to a depth of 30 cm. This study aimed to model and map the spatial variability of SOC stocks across the Brazilian Amazon, Brazil. A total of 649 georeferenced surface soil samples were analysed for soil texture, pH, total nitrogen, SOC, cation exchange capacity (CEC), base saturation (BS), and bulk density. To enhance predictive accuracy, machine learning (ML) algorithms—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—were applied. In parallel, structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed as a complementary analytical method to quantify both direct and indirect effects among predictors and SOC, thereby enabling causal interpretation beyond predictive performance. Model performance was validated through repeated 10-fold cross-validation using the coefficient of determination (R²) and root mean square error (RMSE). Among predictive models, RF achieved the highest accuracy (R² = 0.998; RMSE = 0.068), followed by SVM (R² = 0.992) and ANN (R² = 0.987). Variable importance analysis consistently identified CEC and BS as the dominant SOC predictors, while temperature contributed minimally. SEM explained 92% of SOC variability, with positive effects of CEC (β = 0.42) and negative effects of BS (β = −0.48). These findings highlight the reliability of ML for SOC prediction in developing climate-resilient land management strategies and targeted conservation planning across the Amazon basin. Future research should integrate high-resolution spatial data, deeper soil profiles, and time-series observations to improve SOC stock estimation under changing land use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.